Traduction de «Profil d'identification génétique » (Français → Anglais) :

genetic fingerprint [ DNA fingerprint | genetic profile | DNA profile | DNA identification profile ]

genetic fingerprinting | DNA Fingerprinting

Genetic risk identification

Federal Act of 20 June 2003 on the Use of DNA Profiles in Criminal Proceedings and for the Identification of Unknown and Missing Persons | DNA Profiling Act [ DNAPA ]

session profile identification

The following are the main improvements made by Bill C-13 that still have not come into force: allowing courts to make DNA data bank orders against a person who has committed a designated offence but who was found " not criminally responsible by reason of mental disorder" ; adding Internet luring of a child, uttering threats, criminal harassment, and " criminal organization" offences to the list of designated offences; moving " robbery" and " break and enter into a dwelling house" and child pornography related offences from the list of secondary offences to the list of primary designated offences in order to increase the probability that a court will make a DNA data bank order; creating a new category of 16 extremely serious offences ...[+++]for which the courts will have no discretion whatsoever and must make the order; broadening the definition of secondary designated offences for the purposes of DNA data bank orders to cover all offences under the Criminal Code or the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act that are punishable on indictment by five years or more; including now-repealed sexual offences — among others, indecent assault male, indecent assault female and gross indecency — in the list of sexual offences designated by the retroactive provisions; simplifying the effective taking of bodily substances of offenders on release who are subject to a DNA data bank order, by creating a procedural mechanism compelling the offender to appear at a certain time and place to provide a DNA sample; and finally, Bill C-13 proposed, although this is still not in force, ensuring that an offender's DNA profile remains in the data bank until the order against him has been rescinded.

These changes are as follows: One, the inclusion of the historical offences of indecent assault female, indecent assault male, and gross indecency in the list of designated offences; two, the inclusion of those individuals found not criminally responsible by reason of mental disorder within the DNA data bank scheme; three, clarification of the method of compelling the offender's attendance in court at a hearing to determine whether a DNA data bank order should be made; four, the creation of a process that would permit a judge to make a second DNA data bank order where the National DNA Data Bank has declined to process the first one be ...[+++]cause of police error in completing the forms that must accompany the bodily substance submitted for analysis; five, a creation of mechanisms to require the offender to appear for the purpose of providing a DNA sample; six, the inclusion of persons declared dangerous offenders otherwise than under Part XXIV of the Criminal Code and those offenders convicted of break and enter and commit a sexual offence; and finally, the inclusion of the historical offences of indecent assault female, indecent assault male, and gross indecency in the definition of sexual offence in section 487.055(3) for the purposes of the retroactive scheme.

First, a procedure has been developed to allow the data bank to engage in communications, including the exchange of DNA profiles, without identifying information with regional forensic laboratories in cases where the DNA profiles supplied by those laboratories were less than complete and so there is some doubt whether a profile in the DNA data bank is a match.

The distinction between the two categories of designated offences is that the court is required, subject to a limited discretion, to make a DNA data bank order against an offender convicted of a primary designated offence, while, in the case of secondary designated offences, the prosecutor has discretion to seek a DNA data bank order and the court has a broader discretion not to make the order.