Traduction de «Programme du G20 pour le développement » (Français → Anglais) :

For the EU, it is very important to keep development and food security on the G20 agenda and to emphasise that we all, developed and less developed countries alike, should move towards a greener and more inclusive economy.

The G20 should give a strong impulse for Trade Facilitation and in this way secure a successful outcome of one part of the Doha Development Agenda which is particularly helpful for Least Developed Countries.

2. Notes that, whilst Indo-United States relations have been on an unprecedented high, taking in a civilian nuclear deal signed over a year ago, the current impasse on the DDA has soured relations between the two countries and trade relations have steadily deteriorated, with India blaming the United States for its refusal to cut agricultural subsidies before developing countries start opening their markets to non-agricultural products and the United States threatening to withdraw the benefits of a three-decade old generalised scheme of preferences that allowed duty-free access to certain Indian goods; underlines the fact that a positive ...[+++] result of the DDA needs the full support of both the EU and India; urges India and the G20 to realise that the European offer on agriculture must be matched by the United States and followed by a reasonable offer by the G20 on the National Agri-Marketing Association and on services;

1. Welcomes both India's and the EU's commitment to a successful and ambitious outcome of the DDA; calls to this end on India to use its position as leader of the G20 to reach, by the end of 2006, a balanced agreement favourable to development between the developed countries, the emerging economies and the developing countries; notes that negotiations on the DDA are not incompatible with bilateral WTO+ negotiations; notes that an outcome of a concluded Doha Development Round will reduce the value of schemes such as the GSP to developing countries like India, by further reducing the margin of preference they enjoy at present; calls on ...[+++] the EU to offer to enter into a free trade agreement with India, along the lines of its agreement with Chile, which provides for duty-free entry for the exports of both parties on a reciprocal basis, and calls on the High Level Trade Group to explore mutual opportunities in this regard;

1. Welcomes both India's and the EU's commitment to a successful and ambitious outcome of the DDA; calls to this end on India to use its position as leader of the G20 to reach, by the end of 2006, a balanced agreement favourable to development between the developed countries, the emerging economies and the developing countries; notes that negotiations on the DDA are not incompatible with bilateral WTO+ negotiations; notes that an outcome of a concluded Doha Development Round will reduce the value of schemes such as the GSP to developing countries like India, by further reducing the margin of preference they enjoy at present; calls on ...[+++] the EU to offer to enter into a free trade agreement with India, along the lines of its agreement with Chile, which provides for duty-free entry for the exports of both parties on a reciprocal basis, and calls on the High Level Trade Group to explore mutual opportunities in this regard;

2. Notes that, whilst Indo-United States relations have been on an unprecedented high, taking in a civilian nuclear deal signed over a year ago, the current impasse on the DDA has soured relations between the two countries and trade relations have steadily deteriorated, with India blaming the United States for its refusal to cut agricultural subsidies before developing countries start opening their markets to non-agricultural products and the United States threatening to withdraw the benefits of a three-decade old generalised scheme of preferences that allowed duty-free access to certain Indian goods; underlines the fact that a positive ...[+++] result of the DDA needs the full support of both the EU and India; urges India and the G20 to realise that the European offer on agriculture must be matched by the United States and followed by a reasonable offer by the G20 on the National Agri-Marketing Association and on services;