Traduction de «Rapport pour débats publics » (Français → Anglais) :

They maintain public discussion because when the minister is on record as having responded to a report of the Senate that becomes part of the public domain and the public debate in Canada.

There have been consultations with the parties, so it is my hope that there would be unanimous consent that on Tuesday, June 11, the House shall, during government orders, consider the third reading stage of Bill S-2, an act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, followed by the second reading stage of Bill S-6, an act respecting the election and term of office of chiefs and councillors of certain First Nations and the composition of council of those First Nations, and followed, in turn, by the second reading stage of Bill S-10, an act to implement the Convention on Cluster Munitions; (b) during the consideration at the third re ...[+++]ading stage of Bill S-2 when no member rises to speak or at the expiry of the time provided for debate pursuant to order made Tuesday, June 4, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), whichever is earlier, every question necessary to dispose of the said stage of the bill shall be put forthwith; and successively without further debate or amendment during the consideration at the second reading stage of Bill S-6 when no member rises to speak or at 5:30 p.m., whichever is earlier, every question necessary to dispose of the said stage of the said bill shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate or amendment; (d) during consideration of the second reading stage of Bill S-10 when no member rises to speak or at 10 p.m., whichever is earlier, every question necessary to dispose of the stage of the said bill shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate or amendment; (e) when a recorded division is demanded it shall be deemed deferred in accordance with the manner provided in paragraph (b) of the special order adopted Wednesday, May 22; (f) upon the chair of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development or a member of the committee acting for the chair indicating on a p ...

On the basis of the European debate launched in 2001, the third report on economic and social cohesion makes concrete proposals on the future of regional policy after 2006.

I did that if it's important to record this because it seems to me that if people are asked to do work in which public funds are expended, what they have to say about the subject should be fully and completely recorded, and they should then stand back on the debate and allow those who haven't been funded publicly and haven't been given the great benefit of producing a report like this to engage, and let the debate go on.

GOVERNMENT ORDERS Mr. Ouellet (Minister of Foreign Affairs), seconded by Mr. Robichaud (Secretary of State (Parliamentary Affairs)), moved, That a Special Joint Committee of the House of Commons and the Senate be appointed to consider Canada's foreign policy including international trade and international assistance; That the document entitled ``Guidance Paper for the Special Joint Parliamentary Committee reviewing Canadian Foreign Policy'' be referred to the Committee; That the Committee be directed to consult broadly and to analyze the issues discussed in the above-mentioned document, and to make recommendations in their ...[+++]report concerning the objectives and conduct of Canada's foreign policy; That the Committee be composed of fifteen Members of the House of Commons and seven Members of the Senate; That the Members of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade be appointed on behalf of the House as members of the said Committee; That the Committee have the power to sit during sittings and adjournments of the House; That the Committee have the power to report from time to time, to send for persons, papers and records, and to print such papers and evidence as may be ordered by the Committee; That the Committee have the power to retain the services of expert, professional, technical and clerical staff; That the Committee have the power to adjourn from place to place inside Canada and abroad and that, when deemed necessary, the required staff accompany the Committee; That a quorum of the Committee be twelve Members whenever a vote, resolution or other decision is taken, so long as both Houses are represented and that the Joint Chairpersons be authorized to hold meetings, to receive evidence and authorize the printing thereof, whenever six Members are present, so long as both Houses are represented; That the Committee be empowered to appoint, from among its Members, such sub-committees as may be deemed advisable, and to ...

I would hope in the great public debate that will follow the report of the task force and in the debates that will take place in this House of Commons that he will make those points to the Canadian public.