Traduction de «Redressement à simple alternance » (Français → Anglais) :

25. Notes that ADR mechanisms often depend on the trader's willingness to cooperate, and believes that the availability of an effective judicial redress system would act as a strong incentive for parties to agree an out-of-court settlement, which is likely to avoid a considerable amount of litigation; encourages the setting-up of ADR schemes at European level so as to allow fast and cheap settlement of disputes as a more attractive option than court proceedings, and suggests that judges performing the preliminary admissibility check for a collective action should also have the power to order the parties involved to first seek a collecti ...[+++]ve consensual resolution of the claim before launching collective court proceedings; believes that the criteria developed by the Court should be the starting point for the establishment of this power; stresses, however, that these mechanisms should remain, as the name indicates, merely an alternative to judicial redress, not a precondition therefor;

23. Supports the development of strong EU-wide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms as voluntary, quick and low-cost extra-judicial dispute settlement procedures, as well as of self-regulatory instruments such as codes of conduct; stresses, however, that these mechanisms should remain, as the name indicates, merely an alternative to judicial redress, not a precondition;

· A more climate-resilient, low-carbon economy: Ecosystem-based approaches to climate change mitigation and adaptation can offer cost-effective alternatives to technological solutions, while delivering multiple benefits beyond biodiversity conservation.

The Commission notes that Belgium demonstrated that the alternative, that is to say the continuation of its activities, would have necessitated the financing of the annual cash-drain by IFB until the end of 2005, which would have represented a loss of EUR 10,8 million in total, without any certainty of being able recover the debts of EUR 3,9 million which would have had to be abandoned in the judicial settlement.

However, this option could have proved very lengthy so, after considering the various legal possibilities, a more straightforward and timely alternative was approved by the Commission.

3.4. If a rectified current is used for the test on an audible warning device receiving direct current, the unsmoothed component of the voltage at its terminals, measured from peak to peak during operation of the warning devices, must not exceed 0,1 volts.