Traduction de «Requête écrite en vue de faire valoir le droit » (Français → Anglais) :

90. Supports a migrant-centred and human rights based approach to EU migration policy with the view to enable the Member States and partner countries to respect, protect and fulfil the human rights of all migrants and to enable migrants to claim their rights throughout the migration journey; emphasises that human rights-based and migrant-centred approaches will help to analyse, in a proper way, the root causes of forced migration – notably conflicts, climate change, unemployment and poverty – and ensure that the EU offers ...[+++]adequate responses to these, in line with PCD;

90. Supports a migrant-centred and human rights based approach to EU migration policy with the view to enable the Member States and partner countries to respect, protect and fulfil the human rights of all migrants and to enable migrants to claim their rights throughout the migration journey; emphasises that human rights-based and migrant-centred approaches will help to analyse, in a proper way, the root causes of forced migration – notably conflicts, climate change, unemployment and poverty – and ensure that the EU offers ...[+++]adequate responses to these, in line with PCD;

3. The periods laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be interrupted, in the case covered by paragraph 1, by a request for payment of the fee and, in the case covered by paragraph 2, by a reasoned claim in writing.

8. Takes the view that direct and indirect purchasers should have available to them, for the prosecution of their stand-alone or follow-up claims, individual, collective or representative actions, which can also be brought in the form of a 'test' case, but that in order to avoid multiple actions by a single party for the same cause of action, the selection of one such action should preclude a party from participating in another, either simultaneously or subsequently; considers that in the event that different parties launch separate ...[+++]actions, attempts should be made for those actions to be joined or tried in sequence;

4. Is of the opinion that the application for such an order should be set for hearing within a reasonable time, so as to give the respondent the right to be heard and to enable the court to re-evaluate the situation and decide accordingly, and that notice should be given to the respondent by the bank and by the court as well; considers that the practical difficulties with regard to service of an attachment order, the authenticity of the order and its speedy service on the bank could be addressed by the use of modern communications technology; takes the view that the costs should in the first instance be borne by the applicant, who coul ...[+++]d finally recover them from the respondent in the event that he succeeds in his court action;

In the light of the above, what opportunities are there for the EU to support the Swedish government in its presentation of this case, and what does the Commission usually do to help European patent holders in asserting their rights before American courts?