Traduction de «Salle du public » (Français → Anglais) :

When I speak of testimonial aids and other measures to facilitate testimony, I refer to the following: discretion for the judge to exclude members of the courtroom when necessary for the proper administration of justice; allowing a victim or witness to testify outside the courtroom or behind a screen or device that prevents a view of the accused; allowing the admission of videotaped testimony of a victim or witness who is under the age of 18; permitting a support person to accompany a witness or victim made vulnerable by age or other factors; restricting the personal cross- examination of victims by a self-represented accused; and publication bans on the identit ...[+++]y of victims and witnesses.

Having regard to the freedoms established in the TFEU, collective management of copyright and related rights should entail a rightholder being able freely to choose a collective management organisation for the management of his rights, whether those rights be rights of communication to the public or reproduction rights, or categories of rights related to forms of exploitation such as broadcasting, theatrical exhibition or reproduction for online distribution, provided that the collective management organisation that the rightholder wi ...[+++]shes to choose already manages such rights or categories of rights.

Encourage and support initiatives by professionals, in particular cinema owners, public or commercial television channels, festivals and cultural institutions which aim, in close cooperation with the Member States and the Commission, to organise promotional activities for the general public for European cinematographic and audiovisual creation.

Contribute to the development of educational and awareness-raising activities for young cinema-goers.

Support may be used for the development of educational activities and for raising awareness amongst young cinema-goers.

Can we believe that a judge who is asked to decide on whether the public should be excluded from court does not already consider whether a particular witness would be able to provide the necessary and relevant evidence in a public courtroom?