Traduction de «Système de planification interarmées des missions » (Français → Anglais) :

20. Calls once again for the establishment of a permanent EU operations centre overseen by the Vice-President/High Representative, which would be responsible for operational planning and the conduct of military operations; calls for this operations centre to be attached to the EEAS; stresses that the division of the existing system into seven headquarters makes it less effective and responsive and generates huge costs, and that a permanent interlocutor in the military sphere is essential for civil and military coordination on the ground; takes the view that the permanent o ...[+++]perations centre could therefore be classed as a form of military planning and conduct capability, and located in the same place as the CPCC in order to allow the necessary synergies for effective civilian and military coordination; reiterates that the EU operations centre would facilitate cooperation with NATO, without compromising the decisional autonomy of both organisations;

20. Calls once again for the establishment of a permanent EU operations centre overseen by the Vice-President/High Representative, which would be responsible for operational planning and the conduct of military operations; calls for this operations centre to be attached to the EEAS; stresses that the division of the existing system into seven headquarters makes it less effective and responsive and generates huge costs, and that a permanent interlocutor in the military sphere is essential for civil and military coordination on the ground; takes the view that the permanent o ...[+++]perations centre could therefore be classed as a form of military planning and conduct capability, and located in the same place as the CPCC in order to allow the necessary synergies for effective civilian and military coordination; reiterates that the EU operations centre would facilitate cooperation with NATO, without compromising the decisional autonomy of both organisations;

Improve the ability of civilian ESDP to react more quickly to crises through continuing work on rapidly-deployable capabilities; Explore, with the individual Member States concerned, additional details in order to further improve understanding of the particular abilities of Member States' personnel; Establish a “targeted list” of the highest-priority capability shortfalls and a system to ensure that efforts to address them remain co-ordinated; Consider issues related to ensuring the quality of civilian-crisis management personnel; Actively foster the involvement of key national stakeholders in ESDP civilian crisis-management, notably ...[+++] those engaged in the raising of mission personnel in each priority area for ESDP civilian crisis management; Intensify activity to address Mission Support, including the requirement for equipment procurement and disposal, logistics, security, human resources, and financing for civilian operations; Share best practice amongst Member States, other international actors and third states to improve or generate new ways for Member States to recruit civilian personnel to crisis-management missions; Provide adequate resources to meet EU ambitions in the field of Civilian ESDP; and Continue to reinforce, as appropriate, planning and mission support capacity within the Council Secretariat.

With the CJOC, the Commander Joint Operations Centre, we have this summer stood up seven of our space operators that will provide initial support to all of our operations in terms of mission planning, weather support, space weather — all of the things that we need now to do in terms of our awareness and how we execute operations abroad.

The TBS, the Department of Finance, and individual departments are assessing these new funding pressures such as further work on our Government-Wide Mission Critical functions, Departmental Critical systems, embedded systems, industry/private sector readiness and contingency planning.

The government-wide percentage complete figures show steady progress in all four categories: mission-critical systems, 83% complete; work stations service and networks, 76% complete—this is government-wide; embedded chips, 79% complete; and contingency planning, while only really got going in the last month and a half or so, is 37% complete.