Traduction de «Terminal de saisie de données » (Français → Anglais) :

data acquisition terminal

manufacturing terminal [ factory terminal | factory floor terminal | factory-data terminal | industrial terminal | industry-oriented terminal ]

data acquisition terminal | data entry terminal

industrial data processing terminal

portable data terminal | PDT | portable data entry terminal | PDE terminal | portable terminal | handheld terminal | pocket terminal

data entry virtual terminal | DEVT [Abbr.]

data entry coordinator | data processing coordinator | data entry supervisor | data records supervisor

data entry operator | data entry clerk | input clerk | computer input operator | data typist

data terminal equipment | DTE [Abbr.]

manual input | keyboard entry | keyboarding | manual data input | manual entry | manual keyboard entry

(ii) if the particular reporting period begins before July 1, 2010 and ends on or after that day and if section 67 does not apply to the financial institution, all amounts, each of which is determined by the following formula in respect of tax under any of subsection 165(1) and sections 212 and 218 of the Act that became payable by the financial institution during the particular reporting period or that was paid by the financial institution without having become payable during the particular reporting period — provided that the tax is in respect of property that is in whole or in part delivered or made available after the particular repo ...[+++]rting period or in respect of a service that is rendered in whole or in part after the particular reporting period — or in respect of tax under section 218.01 of the Act that became payable by the financial institution during the particular reporting period, or that was paid by the financial institution without having become payable during the particular reporting period, and that is determined for a specified year of the financial institution that ends after the particular reporting period:

(a) in the particular year, or in the particular affiliate’s taxation year (referred to in this paragraph as the “PATY”) ending in the FAPI year and one or more taxation years of the particular affiliate each of which follows the PATY and the latest of which is the particular year, all losses of the particular affiliate and the other corporations referred to in paragraph (1.3)(a) for their taxation years ending in the FAPI year would, on the assumption that the particular affiliate and each of those other corporations had no foreign accrual property income for any taxation year, reasonably be considered to have been fully deducted (under the tax law referred to in paragraph (1.3)(a)) against income (as ...[+++]determined under that tax law) of the particular affiliate or those other corporations;

(iii) if the particular reporting period begins before April 1, 2013 and ends on or after that day, all amounts, each of which is determined by the following formula in respect of tax under any of subsection 165(1) and sections 212 and 218 of the Act that became payable by the financial institution during the particular reporting period or that was paid by the financial institution without having become payable during the particular reporting period — provided that the tax is in respect of property that is in whole or in part delivered or made available after the particular reporting period or in respect of a service that is rendered in ...[+++]whole or in part after the particular reporting period — or in respect of tax under section 218.01 of the Act that became payable by the financial institution during the particular reporting period, or that was paid by the financial institution without having become payable during the particular reporting period, and that is determined for a specified year of the financial institution that ends after the particular reporting period:

According to Professor Steve Pudney, Public Sector Economics Research Centre, Department of Economics, Leicester University, “seizure data provide the most direct information on availability of drugs even though drugs seized are not contributing to the available supply”. [78] If one looks at RCMP drug seizure trends, however, it becomes obvious that the data must be used cautiously, because the number of interceptions or the amount seized in one year is not necessarily a true indicator of an increase or decrease in the drug situation.