Traduction de «analyse exhaustive de produit » (Français → Anglais) :

This Report represents the state of play of the transposition of the Directive at the time of drafting the Report, based on the information available to the Commission, and as such is not an exhaustive analysis of existing national provisions.

39. Following its request in its last year's report on the protection of the Communities' financial interests, urges OLAF to present in its next annual report a detailed analysis of the strategies and measures put in place by each Member State in the fight against fraud and for preventing and identifying irregularities in the spending of European funds, including where these are caused by corruption; considers that specific attention should be paid to the implementation of agricultural and structural funds; takes the view that the report, with 27 country profiles, should analyse the approach followed by national judicial and investigat ...[+++]ing bodies and the quantity and quality of controls performed, as well as statistics and reasons in the cases where national authorities did not file indictments following reports by OLAF;

39. Following its request in its last year’s report on the protection of the Communities’ financial interests, urges OLAF to present in its next annual report a detailed analysis of the strategies and measures put in place by each Member State in the fight against fraud and for preventing and identifying irregularities in the spending of European funds, including where these are caused by corruption; considers that specific attention should be paid to the implementation of agricultural and structural funds; takes the view that the report, with 27 country profiles, should analyse the approach followed by national judicial and investigat ...[+++]ing bodies and the quantity and quality of controls performed, as well as statistics and reasons in the cases where national authorities did not file indictments following reports by OLAF;

35. Considers that proposals for a solvency regime for IORPs must recognise the specificities of pensions, bearing in mind that risks in the insurance sector are different from those faced by IORPs, in particular as regards the conditionality of pension rights, the duration of pension portfolios and the fact that IORPs are special-purpose vehicles operating a homogenous product portfolio; stresses that the key aim of such a regime would be to provide enhanced protection to current and future pensioners; believes that the impact of such proposals needs to be fully assessed, in particular with a view to quantifying the additional costs a ...[+++]nd administrative burden; believes that any revision of a solvency regime for IORPs should be carried out within the framework of the existing IORP Directive;

2. Notes with concern that transposition of the crucial notions of "public-interest entity" (PIE) and "network" is leading to differing interpretations among Member States; stresses in this connection that for an undertaking identified as a PIE, and also for the accountant auditing that undertaking, the Directive introduces various far-reaching obligations; notes further that the Directive also introduces various additional obligations for audit firms covered by the definition of "network"; observes that further consideration is needed with regard to the impact of the definition of "network" and the lack of legal clarity regarding the ...[+++] liability of firms for the actions of other firms that belong to the same network; fears in general that a patchwork of definitions will lead to legal uncertainty and high costs of compliance and will thus, ultimately, adversely affect attainment of the Directive's objective; therefore calls on the Commission to undertake a comprehensive review of the implementation of the definitions and the discernible effects of their introduction, and to seek clarity regarding the long-term policy priorities for the EU in this area and the way in which these may best be achieved, in consultation with the Member States;

18. Notes that the report chiefly focuses on controls in the extractive sector and does not include a thorough analysis of fraud in the market; regrets, in this connection, the lack of effective control in markets which would prevent fraudulent imports, such as the irregularities detected in the origin of products in the case of imports of tuna steaks under the GSP-Drugs preferential arrangements or fraudulent imports of cod of a ...[+++]different origin under the agreements with Norway;