Traduction de «appels rejets » (Français → Anglais) :

2. Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to the right of each Member State to organise its emergency services in a way which is most cost-effective and most appropriate to its needs, including the ability to reject calls that are not emergency calls and might not be handled by eCall PSAPs, in particular in the case of manually triggered eCalls.

In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards laying down rules on the form of the product specification; laying down detailed rules on the form and content of the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications; defining the technical characteristics of the Union symbols and indications as well as the rules on their use on products, including the appropriate linguistic versions to be used; granting and extending transitional periods for temporary derogations for use of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indication; laying down detailed rules on the form and content of the r ...[+++]egister of traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down rules for the protection of traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down all measures relating to forms, procedures and other technical details for the application of Title IV; laying down rules for the use of optional quality terms; laying down rules for the uniform protection of indications, abbreviations and symbols referring to the quality schemes; laying down detailed rules on the procedure, form and presentation of applications for registration and of oppositions; rejecting the application; deciding on the registration of a name if an agreement has not been reached; laying down detailed rules on the procedure, form and presentation of an amendment application; cancelling the registration of a protected designation of origin, a protected geographical indication or a traditional speciality guaranteed; and laying down detailed rules on the procedure and form of the cancellation process and on the presentation of the requests for cancellation.

The Commission proposal for a Directive was, however, rejected for a variety of reasons by the Parliament during the first reading. These reasons included lack of most recent scientific results as the basis of the proposal, lack of EC-competence to deal with the welfare of wild animals, calls for the application of the subsidiarity principle with regard to the implementation in the EU of the humane trapping standards, general criticism towards the Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards, requests fore more freedom to address national and regional concerns with regard to trapping, requests for more benefits with regard to ani ...[+++]mal welfare and calls for an impact assessment.

I call on colleagues to support this report which makes an important contribution to dealing with the disgrace of discards.

– The next item is the report by Carl Schlyter, on behalf of the Committee on Fisheries, on a policy to reduce unwanted by-catches and eliminate discards in European fisheries (2007/2112(ΙΝΙ)) (Α6-0495/2007).

In October 2003, the Austrian parliament passed a new law on asylum which is considered by several NGOs, including the humanitarian organisation 'Caritas', as the most restrictive in Europe, especially as a result of two major new provisions in the law: the possibility of expelling the asylum seeker during the appeal procedure and the ban on submitting new evidence during the appeal procedure, owing to the fact that the appeal does not have suspensive effect and the difficulty of accepting new evidence after rejection of an application. ...[+++]This has been severely criticised by the UNHCR.