Traduction de «bien leurs missions » (Français → Anglais) :

Definition: Disorder involving persistent dissocial or aggressive behaviour (meeting the overall criteria for F91.- and not merely comprising oppositional, defiant, disruptive behaviour) occurring in individuals who are generally well integrated into their peer group. | Conduct disorder, group type Group delinquency Offences in the context of gang membership Stealing in company with others Truancy from school

environmental policy consultant | policy officer | environmental policy officer | principal environmental policy officer

higher education access officer | schools liaison and access officer | academic support officer | university access coordinator

fact-finding mission [ experts' mission | experts' working visit | investigative mission ]

policy officer | policy officer for education | education policy officer | policy officer, education

residuary devisee | residuary legatee

non-durable goods [ disposable article | disposable goods | expendable goods | non-durables ]

covenant running with the land

‘law enforcement authorities’ means the competent authorities designated by the Member States in accordance with their national law to carry out law enforcement tasks for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences in connection to illegal content online.

‘competent authorities’ means the competent authorities designated by the Member States in accordance with their national law to carry out tasks which include tackling illegal content online, including law enforcement authorities and administrative authorities charged with enforcing law, irrespective of the nature or specific subject matter of that law, applicable in certain particular fields.

2. Independent experts shall be chosen on the basis of their skills, experience and knowledge appropriate to carry out the tasks assigned to them.

36. Considers that a European coordinated network for animal welfare should be set up under the existing Community or Member State institutions, and that its work should be based on the general animal welfare legislation proposed above; considers that such a network should designate one institution as the coordinating body, which should perform the tasks assigned to the ‘central coordination institute’ referred to in the aforementioned Commission communication of 28 October 2009; considers, furthermore, that such a coordinating body should in no way duplicate tasks of the Commission or other agencies, but should become a support tool p ...[+++]roviding assistance to the Commission, Member States, food chain actors and citizens regarding training and education, best practices, information and consumer communication and assessing and stating its views on future legislative and policy proposals and their impact on animal welfare, assessing animal welfare standards on the basis of the latest available knowledge and coordinating an EU system for testing new techniques;