Traduction de «but marqué contre son camp » (Français → Anglais) :

In order to meet the municipality’s requirement, three different parties that each had shown an interest in parts of the Inner Camp, established a new company called Haslemoen AS (14).

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 62009TJ0202 - EN - Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 April 2011. Deichmann SE v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). Community trade mark - International registration designating the European Community - Figurative mark representing a curved band with dotted lines - Absolute ground for refusal - Absence of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009). Case T-202/09.

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 March 2009 in Case T-191/07 Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) by which that Court dismissed an action brought by the applicant for the word mark “BUDWEISER” for goods in class 32 seeking annulment of Decision R 299/2006-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2007, dismissing the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing registration of the mark in opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the international figurative and word marks “BUDWEISER” a ...[+++]nd “Budweiser Budvar” for goods in classes 31 and 32.

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 62006CJ0238 - EN - Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 October 2007. Develey Holding GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). Appeal - Community trade mark - Three-dimensional mark - Shape of a plastic bottle - Refusal to register - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Earlier national trade mark - Paris Convention - TRIPs Agreement - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. Case C-238/06 P.

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 62005CJ0025 - EN - Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2006. August Storck KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Absolute ground for refusal to register - Figurative mark - Representation of a gold-coloured sweet wrapper - Distinctive character. Case C-25/05 P.

By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 6 December 2001, Procter Gamble Company (‘Procter Gamble’) appealed pursuant to Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice against the judgments of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-128/00 Procter Gamble v OHIM (Square tablet with inlay) [2001] ECR II-2785 (‘Case T-128/00’) and Case T‑129/00 Procter Gamble v OHIM (Rectangular tablet with inlay) [2001] ECR II-2793 (‘Case T‑129/00’), (together hereinafter referred to as ‘the judgments under appeal’), by which the Court of First Instance partially dismissed its actions for annulment of the decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (‘OH ...[+++]IM’) of 8 March 2000 (Cases R‑506/1999‑1 and R‑508/1999‑1), which had rejected its appeals against the refusal to register as Community trade marks three-dimensional tablets for washing machines or dishwashers (‘the contested decisions’).