Traduction de «classement hiérarchique des emplois » (Français → Anglais) :

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 62014FJ0011 - EN - Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015. Bruno Dupré v European External Action Service. Civil service — Staff of the EEAS — Member of the temporary staff — Article 98 of the Staff Regulations — Article 2(e) of the CEOS — Contract of employment — Grading — Plea of illegality of the vacancy notice — Post at grade AD 5 open to staff from national diplomatic services and to officials of grades AD 5 to AD 14 — Principle of corresponden ...[+++]ce between the grade and the post — Judgment by default. Case F-11/14.

In that context, although the call for applications allocates the task of comparing candidates who are the only ones pre-selected in a directorate-general or department to a single, joint body, whereas where there are a number of pre-selected candidates in a given directorate-general or department the task is entrusted to their line managers, that difference in treatment, based on an objective difference in situations and on a procedure organised on the basis of pre-determined legal criteria known in advance to all those involved, is not manifestly disproportionate in the light of the purpose of the applicable rules, which is to draw up ...[+++]a definitive ranking of the top priority candidates.

In its judgment delivered in November 2009 , the General Court upheld OHIM’s decision by finding that the sign ‘1000’ alludes to a quantity and, with regard to the goods referred to in the application for registration, will immediately be perceived by the relevant public, without further thought, as a description of the characteristics of the goods in question, in particular the number of pages and works, amount of data, or the number of puzzles in a collection, or the ranking of items referred to in them.

In fact, of the 22 countries in the Commonwealth who maintain a navy, 18 of them incorporate the executive curl into their ranking system.

The Commissioner and Mr. Mohn will discuss employment policy and Mr. Mohn will present the method of "International Employment Ranking 1996" of the Bertelsmann Foundation.

It is unacceptable if such conduct is unwanted, unreasonable and offensive to the recipient; the fact that a person's rejection of or submission to such conduct on the part of employers or workers (including superiors or colleagues) is used explicitly or implicitly as a basis for a decision which affects that person's access to vocational training, access to employment, continued employment, promotion, salary or any other employment decisions; and/or such conduct creates an intimidating, hostile or humiliating working environment for the recipient.