Traduction de «comparaison informatisée » (Français → Anglais) :

EURODAC consists of a Central Unit within the Commission equipped with a fully automated, computerised central database for comparing fingerprints and a system for electronic data transmission between each participating State and the Central Unit.

EURODAC consists of a Central Unit within the Commission equipped with a fully automated, computerized central database for comparing the fingerprints of asylum applicants and a system for electronic data transmission between each participating State and the Central Unit.

(b) a computerised central database in which the data referred to in Article 5(1), Article 8(2) and Article 11(2) are processed for the purpose of comparing the fingerprint data of applicants for asylum and of the categories of aliens referred to in Article 8(1) and Article 11(1).

(b) a computerised central database in which the data referred to in Article 5(1), Article 8(2) and Article 11(2) are processed for the purpose of comparing the fingerprint data of applicants for asylum and of the categories of aliens referred to in Article 8(1) and Article 11(1);

It covers the 1989 bathing season plus the 1990 figures for Belgium, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, the only Member States to send these details by 15 February 1991. Portugal is exempt from the Directive until 1992, but nevertheless submitted a report for 1990. A new format for submission of the data coupled with computerized mapping and?harmonized wording speeded up publication of the report. From now on, each year a report will be published on the previous bathing season. It must be added that the national measures taken to implement Directive 76/160/EEC have given birth to diverging standards which often make it difficult, if not impossible, to compare ...[+++] water quality in different Member States. Since December 1985, ten years after notification of the Directive, all bathing water is required to comply with the values laid down. However, not all bathing areas in the Community are yet up to these standards. A number of infringement procedures have been brought against such cases. Similar procedures have been initiated to solve other shortcomings, such as failure to measure specific parameters, inadequate sampling frequency, etc. Nevertheless, the results show a constant improvement in bathing water quality, as the Member States have made greater efforts to treat their effluent.