Traduction de «crédit pour imprévus » (Français → Anglais) :

contingency appropriation

contingency earmarking

contingency earmarking

handle risk situations | manage life-threatening situations | deal with unforeseen hospitality incidents | deal with unforeseen incidents in hospitality

contingency funds

external contingency element | contingency element

loan officer | credit officer

develop specific technical outdoor skills | react appropriately to outdoor unexpected events | follow up on changing conditions | react acordingly to unexpected events outdoors

loan approval officer | mortgage guideline underwriters | mortgage guideline underwriter | mortgage loan underwriter

118. Underlines that, barely two years after the beginning of the current MFF, the Commission has had to twice request the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, as well as the deployment of the Contingency Margin, in order to cover pressing and unforeseen needs that could not be financed within the existing MFF ceilings; also notes that the Global Margin for Commitments in 2015, the first year of its operation, was immediately utilised to its full extent while the resources of two important Union programmes needed to be reduced to allow for the financing of new initiatives; underlines that, due to the frontloading in 2014-15, sev ...[+++]eral Union programmes have less or even no commitments available as of 2016; clearly sees, therefore, that the MFF ceilings are too tight in many headings and paralyse the Union in areas of greatest need, while the available MFF flexibility mechanisms have already been pushed to their limits; considers that these developments make the case for a genuine MFF mid-term revision; eagerly anticipates the ambitious Commission proposals to that effect in 2016;

7. Acknowledges from the Foundation that Title II carry-overs were mainly due to the procurement of IT hardware and software, urgent and unexpected repair works and refurbishment works already contracted and planned for the beginning of 2014, and that Title III carry-overs resulted mainly from multiannual projects for which activities were already implemented, as well as from unplanned carry-overs such as increased budget for several projects with enhanced scope and quality, translation services ordered at year end and late invoicing by contractors;

9. Welcomes the fact that Council, in the end, agreed to the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2014, even though to a lower amount than needed; welcomes furthermore the overall reinforcement of payments in the 2014 budget, on a number of budget lines up to a level of EUR 4,2 billion, of which EUR 3 168,2 million will be mobilised through the Contingency Margin for 2014, as well as the fact that the increases proposed in DAB No 3/2014 in payment appropriations for Heading 1a and Heading 4 have been largely preserved in the final compromise; notes that the reinforcements mainly target sub-heading 1b, where the bulk of the problem ...[+++] of unpaid bills at year-end currently lies; recalls that the Parliament, in its reading on the budget 2014, already envisaged the greater need for payment appropriations (the final agreement was EUR 983 million lower than the adopted Parliament position); calls on the Council not to try to artificially cut the Union budget every year;

9. Welcomes the fact that Council, in the end, agreed to the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2014, even though to a lower amount than needed; welcomes furthermore the overall reinforcement of payments in the 2014 budget, on a number of budget lines up to a level of EUR 4,2 billion, of which EUR 3 168,2 million will be mobilised through the Contingency Margin for 2014, as well as the fact that the increases proposed in DAB No 3/2014 in payment appropriations for Heading 1a and Heading 4 have been largely preserved in the final compromise; notes that the reinforcements mainly target sub-heading 1b, where the bulk of the problem ...[+++] of unpaid bills at year-end currently lies; recalls that the Parliament, in its reading on the budget 2014, already envisaged the greater need for payment appropriations (the final agreement was EUR 983 million lower than the adopted Parliament position); calls on the Council not to try to artificially cut the Union budget every year;