Traduction de «feuille de données de faits législatifs » (Français → Anglais) :

Regrets that little progress has been made to implement Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 as regards the obligation for the institutions, agencies and other bodies to keep complete registers of documents, as provided for in its Articles 11 and 12 and, ultimately, in the Lisbon Treaty and the Charter of Fundamental Rights; calls for a common approach on registers to be established, and calls on those EU institutions that have not yet established registers of documents to do so, and to implement measures to standardise the classification and presentation of the institutions’ documents; reiterates, in this regard, further to a common access point to EU documents through the three institutions’ portals, its call for common procedures and criteria ...[+++]for registration and the assignment of an interinstitutional code to each document so that, eventually, a common interinstitutional register, including a dedicated joint database on the state of play of legislative files, could be established.

1. Stresses the need for compliance with fundamental rights, in particular data protection legislation, of all initiatives developed under the Digital Single Market Strategy, while recognising the strategy’s added value to the EU economy; underlines the fact that respect for fundamental rights, in particular privacy and the protection of personal data, are key elements in building citizens’ trust and security, which are necessary for the development of the data-driven economy to embrace the potential of the digital sector and should ...[+++]thus be considered as creating opportunities and a competitive advantage; stresses the need for cooperation between technologies, business and public authorities to ensure compliance with the applicable EU legislation; recalls the importance of swift adoption of both the General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Directive, in the interest of both data subjects and businesses; calls for the revision of the ePrivacy Directive to ensure the consistency of provisions with the data protection package by the time of the entry into force of the package;

12. Requests that the Presidents of the four institutions submit an ambitious ‘roadmap’ outlining the necessary legislative and institutional progress to create the best future possible for the eurozone, the EU and its citizens; stresses that Parliament shall fully play its part in the upcoming discussions and decisions through a resolution adopted by the plenary, which shall be the basis for the President’s contribution to the ‘roadmap’, as stated in footnote 1 of the Analytical Note prepared for the Informal European Council of 12 ...[+++]February 2015 (Preparing for Next Steps on Better Economic Governance in the Euro Area): ‘The President of the European Commission has indicated his intention to draw on input from the President of the European Parliament in his reflections during the preparation of the report’;

21. Welcomes the fact that the Commission is considering ‘privacy by design’ and recommends that any concrete implementation thereof be based on the existing EU model of the New Approach and the New Legislative Framework with respect to goods, in order to ensure free movement of products and services conforming to harmonised privacy and data protection requirements; highlights the need for any implementation thereof to be based on sound and concrete criteria and definitions in order to ensure users’ right to privacy and data protecti ...[+++]on, legal certainty, transparency, a level playing field and free movement; believes that ‘privacy by design’ should be based on the principle of data minimisation, meaning that all products, services and systems should be built in such a way as to collect, use and transmit only the personal data absolutely necessary for them to function;

21. Believes that the EU and the US are fundamental and loyal allies in the fight against terrorism and that this legislative framework should therefore be the basis for the negotiation of a possible international agreement, based on the assumption that SWIFT as a Belgian company is subject to Belgian law and is consequently responsible for the treatment of data in accordance with Article 4(1) of Directive 95/46/EC; points out that the natural consequence would be for SWIFT to be obliged to stop its current practice of mirroring all ...[+++]data concerning EU citizens and enterprises in its US site or to move its alternative database site outside US jurisdiction ; urges that this international agreement provide the necessary guarantees against abuse of data for economic and business purposes;

21. Believes that the EU and the US are fundamental and loyal allies in the fight against terrorism and that this legislative framework should therefore be the basis for the negotiation of a possible international agreement, based on the assumption that SWIFT as a Belgian company is subject to Belgian law and is consequently responsible for the treatment of data in accordance with Article 4(1) of Directive 95/46/EC; points out that the natural consequence would be for SWIFT to be obliged to stop its current practice of mirroring all ...[+++]data concerning EU citizens and enterprises in its US site or to move its alternative database site outside US jurisdiction ; urges that this international agreement provide the necessary guarantees against abuse of data for economic and business purposes;