Traduction de «financement pour imprévus » (Français → Anglais) :

contingent financing

compensatory and contingency financing facility

Compensatory and Contingency Financing Facility

Compensatory and Contingency Facility | Compensatory and Contingency Financing Facility | CCF [Abbr.] | CCFF [Abbr.]

contingency financing facility

compensatory and contingency financing facility | CCFF [Abbr.]

Compensatory and Contingency Financing Facility

contingency financing facility

external contingency element | contingency element

handle risk situations | manage life-threatening situations | deal with unforeseen hospitality incidents | deal with unforeseen incidents in hospitality

Increased national co-financing to incentivise sound spending and ownership; An unallocated portion of funding at the beginning of the budget period could be reserved for unexpected developments and help respond to new challenges more quickly.

115. Underlines that, barely two years after the beginning of the current MFF, the Commission has had to twice request the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, as well as the deployment of the Contingency Margin, in order to cover pressing and unforeseen needs that could not be financed within the existing MFF ceilings; also notes that the Global Margin for Commitments in 2015, the first year of its operation, was immediately utilised to its full extent while the resources of two important Union programmes needed to be reduced to allow for the financing of new initiatives; underlines that, due to the frontloading in 2014-15, sev ...[+++]eral Union programmes have less or even no commitments available as of 2016; clearly sees, therefore, that the MFF ceilings are too tight in many headings and paralyse the Union in areas of greatest need, while the available MFF flexibility mechanisms have already been pushed to their limits; considers that these developments make the case for a genuine MFF mid-term revision; eagerly anticipates the ambitious Commission proposals to that effect in 2016;

118. Underlines that, barely two years after the beginning of the current MFF, the Commission has had to twice request the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, as well as the deployment of the Contingency Margin, in order to cover pressing and unforeseen needs that could not be financed within the existing MFF ceilings; also notes that the Global Margin for Commitments in 2015, the first year of its operation, was immediately utilised to its full extent while the resources of two important Union programmes needed to be reduced to allow for the financing of new initiatives; underlines that, due to the frontloading in 2014-15, sev ...[+++]eral Union programmes have less or even no commitments available as of 2016; clearly sees, therefore, that the MFF ceilings are too tight in many headings and paralyse the Union in areas of greatest need, while the available MFF flexibility mechanisms have already been pushed to their limits; considers that these developments make the case for a genuine MFF mid-term revision; eagerly anticipates the ambitious Commission proposals to that effect in 2016;

On 20 April 2011, the Commission tabled a proposal (COM (2011)0206) to revise the current MFF 2007-13 on the basis of points 21 to 23 of the IIA, in order to accommodate the additional unforeseen additional funding needs for ITER for the years 2012-2013 by raising the ceiling of Heading 1a. That proposal should serve as a basis for an agreement between the two arms of the budgetary authority which should be concluded with recourse to all the means provided in the IIA and without deployments from the Seventh Framework Programme for Research to the Euratom Framework Programme;