Traduction de «groupe professionnel militaire commun » (Français → Anglais) :

Occupation Specification Validation Board [ OSVB | Classification Specification Validation Board | Trade Specification Validation Board ]

Basic Military Occupation Training [ Basic MOC Training | basic classification training ]

Working Party on New Guidelines for a Common Vocational Training Policy

Common Classification of Occupational Groups | CCOG [Abbr.]

Common Classification of Occupational Groups | CCOG [Abbr.]

1. If a member of the Canadian Forces was reclassified from the general service officer military classification to the pilot classification during the period beginning on December 1, 1977 and ending on December 31, 1994 and as a result of that classification received an amount representing pay and allowances and, in certain cases, annuities or other benefits under the Canadian Forces Superannuation Act that was in excess of the amount that would have been paid had the incentive pay of that member been calculated in accordance with the Canadian Forces Administrative Order governing transfers to the pilot military occupation, remission of ...[+++]the amount of the excess payment is hereby granted to that member, including any interest payable on it.

I was involved many years ago in this trade business, working with the committee, and one of the things we suggested was never mind this rank and trade, which is the American system—tech sergeant, tech this, tech corporal.

1. Calls on the EU and its Member States to address the root causes of the rapidly deteriorating situation across the MENA region through a holistic and ambitious approach; supports the international campaign against ISIL/Da’esh and welcomes the commitment of the coalition partners to working together under a common strategy; welcomes, in particular, the action taken by the EU Member States participating in the international coalition against ISIS, whether in the form of military strikes or through logistical, financial and humanita ...[+++]rian participation; calls, however, for increased mobilisation in all spheres and emphasises the need for better-articulated actions; notes that these actions could usefully be coordinated under the auspices of the EU, if necessary as part of a Common Security and Defence (CSDP) operation, and to this end calls on the EU to develop sufficient operational capacity and to put in place a true common European defence; stresses, however, that a tailored response must be found, based on political and cross-regional differences, to the issue of combating ISIL/Da’esh, the al-Nusra Front and other terrorist groups; calls on the EU to take on the role of main facilitator of a regional dialogue involving all regional stakeholders, in particular the LAS, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran; recalls the importance of addressing the legitimate demands of local populations, notably as expressed during the Arab uprisings of 2011, with a view to ensuring the long-term stability of the region; notes the recent announcement by the LAS of the formation of a standing rapid-response unit, with a particular emphasis on fighting ISIS and other emerging terrorist groups;

1. Calls on the EU and its Member States to address the root causes of the rapidly deteriorating situation across the MENA region through a holistic and ambitious approach; supports the international campaign against ISIL/Da’esh and welcomes the commitment of the coalition partners to working together under a common strategy; welcomes, in particular, the action taken by the EU Member States participating in the international coalition against ISIS, whether in the form of military strikes or through logistical, financial and humanita ...[+++]rian participation; calls, however, for increased mobilisation in all spheres and emphasises the need for better-articulated actions; notes that these actions could usefully be coordinated under the auspices of the EU, if necessary as part of a Common Security and Defence (CSDP) operation, and to this end calls on the EU to develop sufficient operational capacity and to put in place a true common European defence; stresses, however, that a tailored response must be found, based on political and cross-regional differences, to the issue of combating ISIL/Da’esh, the al-Nusra Front and other terrorist groups; calls on the EU to take on the role of main facilitator of a regional dialogue involving all regional stakeholders, in particular the LAS, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran; recalls the importance of addressing the legitimate demands of local populations, notably as expressed during the Arab uprisings of 2011, with a view to ensuring the long-term stability of the region; notes the recent announcement by the LAS of the formation of a standing rapid-response unit, with a particular emphasis on fighting ISIS and other emerging terrorist groups;