Traduction de «immunité diplomatique » (Français → Anglais) :

diplomatic immunity [ consular law | diplomatic law | Privileges and immunities(ECLAS) ]

diplomatic immunity

diplomatic immunity

Diplomatic Immunities (Commonwealth Countries) Act [ An Act to provide diplomatic and consular immunities for Commonwealth representatives in Canada ]

diplomatic immunities

enjoy diplomatic immunities/to

An Act Respecting Diplomatic and Consular Privileges and Immunities in Canada

An Act to amend the Diplomatic and Consular Privileges and Immunities Act

diplomatic representation [ diplomatic corps | diplomatic delegation | diplomatic mission | diplomatic service ]

diplomatic profession [ ambassador | consul | delegation staff | diplomat | diplomatic agent | diplomatic representative | diplomatic staff ]

Your government already extends diplomatic immunity more broadly than the Vienna Convention requires, for example, giving immunity to staff a number of our allies do not give immunity to, and your bill proposes to place hundreds, potentially thousands, of staff and foreign entrants coming for conventions and so on above our laws.

I asked why diplomatic immunity would apply there, and I was informed by more knowledgeable and experienced senior members of the committee that it was okay for that person to be diplomatically immune because they were in the same household as someone who had full diplomatic immunity, so it was extended to them as well.

...s the government engaged in any consultations, either with the provinces or with any other relevant stakeholders, regarding Canada’s failure to sign and accept the Third Optional Protocol referred to in (i); (m) has the government engaged in any discussions or consultations regarding Canada’s failure to sign the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of all Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (ICPRMW), (i) does Canada’s failure to sign the ICPRMW referred to in (e) cause it to be derelict with regard to its obligations pursuant to any international treaty or tenet of customary international law, (ii) is th ...[+++]ere any process, formal or otherwise, by which an individual can issue a complaint pertaining to Canada’s obligations towards migrant workers and temporary foreign workers under international law, (iii) is it the position of the government that temporary foreign workers in Canada who believe there rights pursuant to either domestic or international law have been violated should be allowed to remain in Canada pending the outcome of judicial proceedings in this regard, (iv) is there any formal policy in place by which temporary foreign workers in Canada can ensure that they are not deported pending the outcome of judicial proceedings relating to an alleged violation of their rights under international law, (v) does Canada have an obligation under international law to ensure that temporary foreign workers have access to Canadian courts to adjudicate violations of their rights under domestic or international law, (vi) is there any legal or constitutional barrier to Canada becoming a State Party to the ICPRMW referred to in (e); and (n) has the government engaged in any review of its obligations under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), (i) has the government engaged in any discussions or consultations regarding Canada’s failure to sign the Optional Protocol to the CRPD, (ii) has the government or any minister consulted with any individuals or organizations who have expressed any positions with regard to Canada’s failure to sign the Third Optional Protocol referred to in (i), (iii) does Canada’s failure to sign the Optional Protocol referred to in (i) cause it to be derelict with regard to its treaty obligations, pursuant to either CRPD or any other international treaty or tenet of customary international law, (iv) is there any process, formal or otherwise, by which an individual can issue a complaint or communication to any international or intergovernmental organization or international tribunal pertaining to Canada’s obligations under the Optional Protocol referred to in (i), (v) has the government received any complaints or communications from any individuals, organizations, or State Parties to the international agreement referred to in (n) regarding its obligations under any of those agreements, (vi) has the government taken any action in response to such complaints referred to in (v), (vii) does the government have a position as to whether the Optional Protocol referred to in (i) violates any section of the Constitution Act, 1867 and, if so, what specific sections does it violate, (viii) has the government engaged in any consultations – either with the provinces or with any other relevant stakeholders regarding Canada’s failure to sign and accept the Third Optional Protocol referred to in (i)? ...

Will the Commission clarify which of its employees, which employees in other EU institutions, and which employees in EU agencies are entitled to diplomatic immunity ?