Traduction de «indemnité de fin de campagne » (Français → Anglais) :

32. Notes that the European Parliament Eurobarometer survey (EB/EP 82.5) shows that during the 2014 electoral campaign 23 % of the respondents had a very negative image of Parliament, while 43 % had a neutral image; points out that media analysis suggests that a negative image is often related to financial arrangements for Members such as allowances, salaries and the budget of Parliament in general; is convinced therefore that structural improvements, for example full transparency and the accounting of the general expenditure allowance, are needed to improve trust and support for Parliament;

31. Notes that the European Parliament Eurobarometer survey (EB/EP 82.5) shows that during the 2014 electoral campaign 23 % of the respondents had a very negative image of Parliament, while 43 % had a neutral image; points out that media analysis suggests that a negative image is often related to financial arrangements for Members such as allowances, salaries and the budget of Parliament in general; is convinced therefore that structural improvements, for example full transparency and the accounting of the general expenditure allowance, are needed to improve trust and support for Parliament;

9. Recalls that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to job searches and training programmes instead of contributing directly to financial allowances; notes that, if included in the package, such allowances should be of a complementary nature and should never replace allowances under the responsibility of Member States or companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements; stresses, in this context, that the new EGF regulation for 2014-2020 will limit the inclusion of financial allowances in the package to a maximum of 35 % of the cost of the measures and that a disproportionate rate of allowances will not be repeate ...[+++]d under the new regulation;

9. Recalls that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to job searches and training programmes instead of contributing directly to financial allowances; notes that, if included in the package, such allowances should be of a complementary nature and should never replace allowances under the responsibility of Member States or companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements; stresses, in this context, that the new EGF regulation for 2014-2020 will limit the inclusion of financial allowances in the package to a maximum of 35 % of the cost of the measures and that a disproportionate rate of allowances will not be repeate ...[+++]d under the new regulation;

9. In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 13(1) of the Rules Governing the Payment of Expenses and Allowances, as applicable at the material time, ‘Members shall be entitled to a monthly lump sum allowance at the rate currently fixed by the Bureau to meet expenditure resulting from their activities in their capacity as Members not covered by other allowances under these Rules (hereinafter referred to as the “general expenditure allowance”)’.

Particularly serious are the measures designed to abolish the minimum price, which affects tomatoes destined for processing, the reduction in the limit for aid for operational funds from 4.5% to 3% of the value of the production marketed by each producer organisation, the precautionary reduction of 9.1% of the amount of aid for the first marketing year following the reform of the COM and a reduction in the citrus fruit withdrawal ceiling.