Traduction de «normes de délai » (Français → Anglais) :

Cost/Schedule Performance management Standard

early-warning system for standards production deadlines

deadline for submission of applications (1) | application deadline (2) | deadline (3)

limited time [ time period | time limited | time limitation | time limit | time appointed | period provided for | time prescribed | prescribed time | period | time allowed | period allowed | period specified | period set out | specified time | time fixed | delay | time specified | prescribed time frame ]

answering time of operator | delay time | request transmission time | setting up time of an international call

elapsed-time standard

Cost Schedule Performance Management Standards

average collection period | collection period | collection period of receivables | collection ratio | days accounts receivable outstanding | days receivable outstanding | days' sales in receivables | debtor collection period | debtor days ratio | number of days' sales in accounts receivable

Even taking into account the high number of figures of victims who directly received a residence permit in Italy and the estimated number of people who were granted a reflection period between 2003 and 2006 in the UK (155), the reflection period still seems to remain to be implemented in most countries.[6] This may well imply that the majority of identified victims are immediately deported, which is inconsistent with human rights standards, implies that an important source of evidence is lost, and constitutes a clear breach of the Directive.

The Commission will put deadlines in its requests for standards and funding will be conditional on the ESOs fulfilling criteria related, inter alia to the speed of standards development, the adequate representation of stakeholders and the quality, relevance and timeliness of standards produced.

8. Points out that in the recently adopted Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) the time period for scrutinising RTS may be extended by a further month given their volume and complexity, and considers that this kind of flexibility should become a general rule; considers that deadlines for objections by Parliament to delegated acts adopted by the Commission need to be sufficiently long to allow for the full exercise of Parliament’s rights of scrutiny, taking into account the plenary calendar and workload; takes the view that the standard deadline of two months, extendable by two months, as provided for the in the Common Understanding is not sufficiently long for complex matters and extensive delega ...[+++]ted acts, which call for a longer scrutiny period to be set; recalls that the co-legislator has full discretion regarding the period of scrutiny to be set in the basic act; stresses, in this regard, that where the Common Understanding provides guidelines in relation to deadlines, it is in no way binding and therefore does not limit the legislator in this respect; points out that the legislator has set a period of scrutiny of three months, extendable by three months, for all delegated acts in the area of financial services, and considers that this practice should be extended to other areas of a complex nature;

5. A technical standard adopted pursuant to Articles 8(5), 10(2) and 12(4) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of 2 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by [2 months] at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.