Traduction de «on pourrait dire » (Français → Anglais) :

arguably

generally speaking

most (the - that could be said was that)

multiple hearsay | second-hand hearsay

hearsay evidence | hearsay testimony

double hearsay double hearsay | hearsay upon hearsay | hearsay within hearsay | totem pole hearsay

Definition: The majority of compulsive acts are concerned with cleaning (particularly handwashing), repeated checking to ensure that a potentially dangerous situation has not been allowed to develop, or orderliness and tidiness. Underlying the overt behaviour is a fear, usually of danger either to or caused by the patient, and the ritual is an ineffectual or symbolic attempt to avert that danger.

Definition: A disorder in which the child, having previously made normal progress in language development, loses both receptive and expressive language skills but retains general intelligence; the onset of the disorder is accompanied by paroxysmal abnormalities on the EEG, and in the majority of cases also by epileptic seizures. Usually the onset is between the ages of three and seven years, with skills being lost over days or weeks. The temporal association between the onset of seizures and loss of language is variable, with one preceding the other (either way round) by a few months to two years. An inflammatory encephalitic process ha ...[+++]s been suggested as a possible cause of this disorder. About two-thirds of patients are left with a more or less severe receptive language deficit.

obligation to tell the truth

Given that — and Senator Stratton has made the point about the law being organic — it would be difficult to say that there could be no pretext for judicial intervention, even if we were talking about a purely internal system, except to say that, I think, surely under those circumstances the only circumstances one might postulate for judicial intervention would be those where the behaviour of the chamber was so outlandish that it would be said to have stepped outside any conceivable realm of privileged activity.

If such a consultative process were introduced, a prime minister could say, " I will follow the consultative process," but the next one says, " I may or may not do so" or " I have no intention of doing so" .

We could say that if Article 136 – that is, the permanent crisis mechanism – is invoked, the Commission will automatically be able to start this procedure, and that the Council will not be able to block this with a reversed qualified majority. Thus, there is a real automatic aspect to the penalties.

He can tell his Prime Minister to do the right thing for Saskatchewan, where the hon. member is from, and for Atlantic Canada, and he can tell all those members from Atlantic Canada to vote against the budget.