Traduction de «phase de composante contrapolaire » (Français → Anglais) :

cross-polar component | cross-polarized component

cross-polar component [ cross-polarized component ]

cross-polar component due to the atmosphere

set of components of a polyphase linear quantity | set of components of a m-phase linear quantity | components of a polyphase linear quantity | components of a m-phase linear quantity

in phase component

discrete phase noise component

- Implementation phase (2004-2006) focusing on: (i) a structured dialogue between users and providers; (ii) the development of cost-beneficial services capable of reaching an operational status; (iii) space component design activities, leading to their procurement; (iv) in-situ component assessment and subsequent upgrading; (v) enabling data integration and information management activities, with the objective of improving coherence and access; (vi) the development of long-term funding strategy and business plan.

- Operational phase (2007 onwards) aiming to: (i) deliver regular operational services (upgrades and new services); (ii) implement the space component; (iii) expand the in-situ component; (iv) operate a sustained data integration and information management capacity.

a development and validation phase which runs from 2002 to 2005 and covers the development of the satellites and the system's ground components, as well as validation in orbit.

(Return tabled) Question No. 848 Mr. Matthew Kellway: With regard to the National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy (NSPS): (a) has a statement of operational requirements been established, (i) if yes, when was this done and what are the criteria that will be used to determine what ships will be built, (ii) if no, when will it be done, (iii) if it will not be done, what criteria will be used to determine what ships will be built; (b) will there be an open competition for contracts associated with the strategy; (c) what is a current breakdown of the $35 billion contract value that was assessed, specifically, what is the value of each individual component included ...[+++]in this assessed value; (d) where will the technology being used to build the ships come from; (e) what components will be included in each ship (i.e., hull, weapons systems, propulsion, etc.); (f) will the ships have all components necessary for deployment, (i) if not, why not and which components will need to be procured at a future date, (ii) if yes, what contracts have been signed that to account for this answer; (g) how will the contracts be awarded, specifying (i) how many ships will be built, (ii) which shipyards will be used for construction, (iii) what will be the dollar value of contracts awarded to each of the shipyards; (h) what are the details of any changes the government has made to the strategy and associated contracts as a result of delays in delivery (for example, in the case of the Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ships (AOPS)) and what are the impacts of the delays in delivery on the overall cost of the project, identifying in particular whether and how delays have impacted the estimated $3.1 billion cost of the AOPS; (i) has there been an evaluation of how many jobs will be created by this strategy, if yes, (i) how many jobs are expected to be created and for what duration, (ii) who conducted this evaluation, (iii) have the job creation projections been independently verified, and, if yes, ...