Traduction de «précédemment que puisque » (Français → Anglais) :

The grounds for this decision (which took no account of Mr Achille Occhetto's statement of withdrawal) were that, 'unlike what occurred in the case of the first constituency (Italy North-West), Mr Achille Occhetto's 7 July 2004 decision to withdraw as a candidate for election to the European Parliament has had no effect and must therefore be regarded as revocable, since it was taken before the start of the procedure to replace Mr Antonio Di Pietro with the candidate who comes immediately after him on the same list and in the fourth constituency (Italy South)'.

What this means is terms of this framework decision is that a sentence previously handed down in state A may not be taken into account in a new criminal trial in state B if the relevant act was not a punishable offence in B under that state’s own laws. Since this can, ultimately, be determined only by, for example, a judge in state B repeating the whole proceedings from state A complete with the collection of evidence – which would involve such things as re-interviewing witnesses and would be neither desirable nor workable – it must be sufficient that he should have good reason to doubt that the act was punishable.

A majority of MS also report that the contents of PP are gradually being modified as a consequence of the iterative process of conducting the SEA, alongside the preparation of the PP. Specifically, they mention that expensive mitigation measures which were adopted previously may now be superfluous as a direct consequence of the early inclusion of environmental considerations in the PP.

3. Condemns the regime’s decision of 22 August 2005 to ban the Reformed Evangelical Church, which had been present in Belarus for more than 400 years; points out that the Reformed Evangelical Church was outlawed because the community had no legal address, nor could it have registered one, because the authorities had previously evicted it from all of its prayer houses, which is in contravention of the Belarusian law on the freedom of belief;

The Court has not yet been called upon to pronounce on this specific point, but it has previously held that as there is no consensus among the Member States whether same sex partners can be assimilated to spouses of a traditional marriage, it should be concluded that same sex spouses do not yet have the same rights as traditional spouses for the purposes of Community law on the free movement of workers [47].However, it should be noted that if a Member State accords advantages to its own nationals who live as non-married couples, under the principle of equal treatment in social advantages (see section 2.4 above) the same advantages must b ...[+++]e granted to migrant workers [48].

The Court has not yet been called upon to pronounce on this specific point, but it has previously held that as there is no consensus among the Member States whether same sex partners can be assimilated to spouses of a traditional marriage, it should be concluded that same sex spouses do not yet have the same rights as traditional spouses for the purposes of Community law on the free movement of workers [47].However, it should be noted that if a Member State accords advantages to its own nationals who live as non-married couples, under the principle of equal treatment in social advantages (see section 2.4 above) the same advantages must b ...[+++]e granted to migrant workers [48].