Traduction de «règlement de revendication territoriale » (Français → Anglais) :

risk that the intended recipient would use the military technology or equipment to be exported aggressively against another country or to assert by force a territorial claim, or

to reiterate the global importance of the South China Sea and to appeal to all the parties involved to settle their conflicting territorial claims, including those relating to the Spratly/Nansha Islands, by means of international arbitration, in accordance with international law (in particular the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea), in order to ensure regional stability and peace; to condemn recent violent events in Sabah and to call for the peaceful resolution of the situation; to commend Malaysia and Singapore for having peacefully solved in 2010 long-standing territorial and water disputes;

In your speech, you gave a description of what the European ideal is, explaining that it is in cooperation between cultures that we find solutions, that religious intolerance is to be overcome by dialogue between religions, that it is on economic and social integration that peace and peaceful coexistence are founded, and that the surrendering of territorial claims can be accomplished through territorial integration.

These include the confluence of Bantu/Nilotic, Arab, Egyptian and Abyssinian cultures; the large number of wars over secession, autonomy or territorial claims (many of them related to ethnic or religious identity), control of resources and disputed borders; the regional impacts of population growth, climate change and related pressures on natural resources; the friction fuelled by competition for the water resources from the Nile; the high proportion of nomadic pastoralists, bound largely by ethno-linguistic ties rather than political borders, who are among the most marginalised groups in the region; a culture of militarism and cert ...[+++]ain vested interests in war economies; and the neglect, underdevelopment and insecurity of border areas in the region.

In reply to Mr Gollnisch, however, who said something that is not wholly accurate, that the name does not imply any territorial claim, I would say that, unfortunately, the whole problem is that historically, the name was used for territorial claims.

In reply to Mr Gollnisch, however, who said something that is not wholly accurate, that the name does not imply any territorial claim, I would say that, unfortunately, the whole problem is that historically, the name was used for territorial claims.