Traduction de «site propre pour bus » (Français → Anglais) :

busway [ exclusive busway ]

exclusive right-of-way | exclusive way

running on right of way | transport on right of way

rapid transit [ RT | exclusive right-of-way public transit | exclusive right-of-way transit ]

exclusive way

site-specific analysis

semi-exclusive right-of-way | semi-exclusive ROW

3.2.12 Most Member States have established either their own screening criteria or indicative thresholds or make use of the screening criteria in Annex III. Where Member States have established their own criteria these are largely based upon the Annex III list but expand on the Annex III list to include specific nationally designated areas or other factors such as cultural and historic landscapes or archaeological features.

Final report and recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources, December 2016 (EN) Report main recommendations (EN) Questions and answers on the Report by the high-level group on own resources (EN) High-level group on own resources website EU's own resources

(Return tabled) Question No. 334 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to bijuralism and harmonization: (a) what measures are in place to ensure legislative bijuralism across all departments; (b) since the adoption of the “Policy on Legislative Bijuralism”, how has the Department of Justice (i) ensured that all legal counsel in the Department are made aware of the requirements of legislative bijuralism in order for them to be able to take it into account when advising client departments on legislative reforms, (ii) enhanced the capacity of the Legislative Services Branch to draft bijural legislative texts, (iii) undertook, in drafting both versions of every ...[+++] bill and proposed regulation that touches on provincial or territorial private law, to take care to reflect the terminology, concepts, notions and institutions of both of Canada’s private law systems; (c) since the adoption of the “Policy for Applying the Civil Code of Quebec to Federal Government Activities”, what measures are in place to ensure (i) changes to Quebec’s Civil Code are known and monitored by the government, (ii) assessment of federal legislation relative to changes to Quebec’s Civil Code, (iii) federal legislation is introduced to reflect, where necessary, changes to the Civil Code of Quebec; (d) with respect to the “Index of Bijuralism and Harmonization Caselaw” found online and indicating its most recent update was June 12, 2012, (i) how often is this page updated, (ii) given that some cases thereupon are from 2013, when was this page last updated, (iii) whose responsibility is it to update this page, (iv) what cases are currently being monitored for potential addition to this page; (e) with respect to cases involving bijuralism and harmonization, (i) in what ways are these made known to the Department, (ii) whose responsibility it is to monitor these cases, (iii), what role does the Federal government play in these cases if a party, (iv) what role does the government play if not a party, (v) who m ...

In the first place, it is true that the special report from the Ombudsman to the European Parliament of 18 October 1999 (1004/97/(PD)GG), available on the Ombudsman’s web-page, contains a recommendation to the Commission to the effect that, at the latest from 1 July 2000 onwards, the Commission should give candidates access to their own marked examination scripts upon request, and that press release 15/2000 of 31 July 2000, cited by the applicant, available on the Ombudsman’s web-page states that ‘[t]he Commission accepted the Ombudsman’s recommendation with effect from July 2000’.