Traduction de «surface de contrôle » (Français → Anglais) :

Obstacle monitoring surfaces must therefore be developed, implemented and continuously monitored by the competent national authority to identify any infringing penetration.

Question No. 140 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to development of the oil sands, its impacts on the environment and surrounding communities, and the economic effects of these impacts: (a) what, if any, steps has the government taken to establish air emission limits or air quality standards to achieve the World Health Organization’s Air Quality Guidelines to protect air quality and human health; (b) what, if any, steps has the government’s sector-by-sector approach taken to regulate carbon emissions in the oil sands to ensure the oil sands industry makes appropriate reductions in its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to contribute to Canada’s GHG emi ...[+++]ssion reduction goal of 17% below the 2005 level; (c) what, if any, studies has the government undertaken to examine the effect of the oil sands expansion on (i) GHG emissions, (ii) Canada’s ability to meet its GHG emission reduction goals, (iii) Canada’s contribution to the goal of staying below a 2°C increase in global average surface temperature, relative to the pre-industrial level, as articulated at the G8 meeting in L’Aquila, Italy and at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations through the Copenhagen Accord in December 2009 and the Cancun Agreements in December 2010, (iv) the full suite of sustainability criteria, including environmental, economic and social sustainability, and (v) what were the results of any studies identified in (c)(i), (c)(ii), (c)(iii), and (c)(iv); (d) what, if any, studies has the government undertaken to examine (i) the scope of oil sands expansion if the oil sands sector is not required to deliver its proportional share of GHG reductions, (ii) the impacts such a decision would have on other sectors’ allowable GHG emissions, (iii) whether other sectors of the Canadian economy would have to do more than their proportional share to reduce emissions, (iv) what were the results of any studies identified in (d)(i), (d)(ii), and (d)(iii); (e) what, if any, studies ...

€ 122.38 million charged to Greece with regard to insufficient on-the-spot checks and deficiencies in the Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS-GIS) and in administrative cross-checks for area aid (also relates to area based Rural Development measures);

€ 100.6 million charged to Denmark for weaknesses in remote sensing and controls of compliance with set-aside rules (in area aid scheme); € 9.5 million charged to United Kingdom for risk analysis used improperly and insufficient verification of documents within export refunds aid scheme; € 7.2 million charged to Belgium for insufficient number of laboratory tests of sugar within export refunds scheme; € 2.4 million charged to Ireland for weaknesses in risk analysis, insufficient quality and quantity of physical checks within export refunds scheme; € 2.3 million charged to France for failure to meet payment deadlines and absence of sa ...[+++]nctions within food aid scheme; € 1.7 million charged to Belgium for ineligible expenditure in fruits and vegetables scheme comprising environmental packaging and VAT; € 1.5 million charged to Slovenia for deficiencies in key-controls concerning area aid payments; € 1.3 million charged to Greece for insufficient controls and unreliable data on sugar export.

€ 145.2 million charged to Italy for weaknesses in the photo-interpretation of images and in the on-the-spot control procedure based on images from earlier years concerning arable crops (area aids) payments; € 127.7 million charged to Greece for shortcomings in LPIS-GIS system and in on-the-spot checks concerning area aids and nuts payments; € 69.4 million charged to Great Britain for inappropriate timing of the follow-up field visits and for the inaccurate determination of the area eligible for payments.

(2) Council Directive 73/404/EEC of 22 November 1973 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to detergents , Council Directive 73/405/EEC of 22 November 1973 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to methods of testing the biodegradability of anionic surfactants , and Council Directive 82/242/EEC of 31 March 1982 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to methods of testing the biodegradability of non-ionic surfactants and amending Directive 73/404/EEC should , for reasons of clarity and efficiency, be modernised and replaced by a single text; labelling provisions con ...[+++]cerning detergents and cleaning products of Commission Recommendation 89/542/EEC of 13 September 1989 for the labelling of detergents and cleaning products are to be included.