Traduction de «systèmes partagés du type dispatching » (Français → Anglais) :

In his opinion, the EDPS advocates a gradual introduction, starting with one type of data (and not six as proposed by the Commission), indirect access (index data of information that is not available on-line) and a hit/no-hit system, which would allow for more control of the exchange of information than a system based on direct access.

Innovative approaches in areas such as public transport, the organization of public space and the protection of borders can be envisaged. Space, offers great scope for high technology innovation over time (in particular public investors in the application of Galileo [17] and GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security), the Commission's flagship space programmes. These need to share their knowledge of the system and its scope for business with potential downstream users in the space and non-space sectors, to raise their aware ...[+++]ness of potential space-based solutions). Transport, where the demand for energy efficiency provides great opportunities. Marine technologies and products allowing for new uses of the sea such as deep sea drilling, blue biotech exploitation, offshore mariculture and renewable energies, ocean space monitoring and surveillance technologies offer promising scope. Health, which has a huge growth potential for innovative products and services (including in particular e-Health, and the provision of customized solutions to allow elderly people to continue to live independently, pharmaceuticals and medical devices where innovation can bring direct benefits to patients and improve competitiveness), or well-being and culture (for instance creative content services, which gain a new dimension with the rollout of broadband networks, allowing citizens and businesses to access all kind of creative contents such as audiovisual, games, cultural information at home and in mobility) are examples of markets where the public sector has a role to play.

However, from 1995, the United States entered into "open skies" type bilateral agreements with a number of Member States in order to facilitate, in particular, free access to all routes, the granting of unlimited route and traffic rights, the fixing of prices in accordance with a system of "mutual disapproval" and the possibility of sharing codes.

An arrangement such as the EEA agreement may be regarded as a solution of the past, but I would nevertheless like to ask, whether the Commission could, even in principle, consider a possible solution along the lines of the EEA agreement – not as it stands but of that nature – to be used as some sort of ’hatchery’ or incubator for the new Member States prior to actual membership, instead of the applicant countries having to wait for long periods of time before permanent membership becomes a reality. I would further like to ask, whether the Commission shares the view that this kind of arrangement, along the lines of the EEA agreement, coul ...[+++]d considerably reduce the costs of enlargement and promote the economic development of the applicant countries.

Moreover access and benefit sharing will benefit from an increased exchange of information on the collections available world-wide and the type of biodiversity they contain, taking into account existing systems.

What is more, this bill, in addition to invading Quebec's exclusive jurisdiction, accords unheard of powers to the Bank of Canada and the Department of Finance (1025) I am referring to the provisions on pages 117 and 118 of the bill, which stipulate that the Bank of Canada may enter into an agreement with a clearing house or a participant, or both, in respect of: netting arrangements; risk sharing and risk control mechanisms; certainty of settlement and finality of payment; the nature of financial arrangements among participants; the operational systems and financial soundness of the clearing house.