Grant c. Can
ada (Ministre de la Sécurité publique et de la Protection civile), 2010 CF 958 (même si une décision antérieure au sujet du même délinquant avait été renvoyée pour nouvelle décision au motif que les raisons du Ministre n’étaient pas suffisantes (Grant c. Can
ada (Ministre de la Sécurité publique et de la Protection civile), [2010] F.C.J. n 386 (QL)); Holmes c. Can
ada (Ministre de la Sécurité publique ...[+++] et de la Protection civile), 2011 CF 112; Markevich c. Can
ada (Ministre de la Sécurité publique et de la Protection civile), 201
1 CF 113; LeBon v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2011 CF 1018 (en anglais); Tippett v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2011 CF 814 (en anglais).
Grant v.
Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2010 FC 958 (although an earlier decision with respect to the same offender had been sent back for redetermination on the basis that the Minister’s reasons were insufficient (Grant v.
Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), [2010] F.C.J. No. 386 (QL)); Holmes v.
Canada (Minister of ...[+++]Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2011 FC 112; Markevich v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2011 FC 113; LeBon v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2011 FC 1018; Tippett v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2011 FC 814.