Traduction de «trame de transfert d'information » (Français → Anglais) :

1. In the case of a batch file transfer from a single payer where the payment service providers of the payees are established outside the Union, Article 4(1) shall not apply to the individual transfers bundled together therein, provided that the batch file contains the information referred to in Article 4(1), (2) and (3), that that information has been verified in accordance with Article 4(4) and (5), and that the individual transfers carry the payment account number of th ...[+++]e payer or, where Article 4(3) applies, the unique transaction identifier.

All four links were weak, and when that happens, it is difficult for an overseer like the SEC to pick up on what is going on because they are not getting high quality information.

Mr. Speaker, I will continue in the same vein as my last speech on Bill C-15, the Northwest Territories Devolution Act. Today I will talk about the capacity for alienation of the collective heritage in terms of aboriginal rights and the practical outcome of the ratification of modern treaties and agreements between the crown and the first nations.

Question No. 204 Ms. Dawn Black: With regard to detainee handling in Afghanistan: (a) at what time was Canada first granted formal access to Afghan monitor detention facilities in Kandahar; (b) how many Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) officers were in Kandahar in August 2005, and what was the number for each month since; (c) did CSC direct their officers to specifically monitor detainees taken by Canadians and held in Afghan custody, and, if so, what form did that direction take; (d) what type of investigation was begun by the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces following the publishing of reports of torture in ...[+++] the Globe and Mail on Monday, April 23, 2007, and when was it commenced; (e) what is the number of detainees transferred to Afghan custody since the signing of the December 18, 2005, “Arrangement for the Transfer of Detainees Between the Canadian Forces and the Ministry of Defence of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan”; (f) following the processing of transfer documents and the release of a detainee to Afghan authorities, how are National Defence Headquarters, the Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS) and the Minister of National Defence informed of this transfer respectively; (g) when was information about the Department of Foreign Affairs country reports, starting in 2002, describing torture and inhumane treatment in Afghan prisons as “common”, first released outside of the Department and when were i) the current and previous Foreign Affairs Ministers made aware, ii) the current and previous Defence Ministers made aware, iii) the current and previous Prime Ministers made aware; (h) when were negotiations begun on the arrangement for monitoring access announced by the Minister of National Defence on Wednesday April 25, 2007, and i) when were negotiations concluded, ii) when was the CDS made aware of the arrangement, iii) when was the Minister of Foreign Affairs made aware of the arrangement, iv) when was the Prime Minister made awa ...

Under PIPEDA—and Mr. Stanton is correct in the chapter and verse that he cited—information collected by a private sector organization in secret, and without any constraints other than that the organization has suspicion that something is going on, that information could well be handed over to the RCMP and form the basis of a charge.

The amendments may be summarized as follows: - an increase in herring availabilities for the Community in CIEM Division III(a) to take account of a transfer of 375 tonnes from Sweden; - an increase in cod availabilities for the Community in the Skagerrak (CIEM Division III(a)) to take account of a transfer of 300 tonnes from Sweden; - a reduction in deepwater prawn availabilities for the Community in the Skagerrak (CIEM Division III(a)) as compensation to Sweden for the aforementioned transfers; - an increase in the interim TAC for ...[+++] sprats in the North Sea (CIEM Divisions II(a) and IV) to 174,000 tonnes to take account of a transfer of 4,000 tonnes to Norway, which will be compensated by an increase in the Community's "other species" quota in Norwegian waters; - an increase in cod availabilities for the Community in the Baltic Sea (CIEM Division III(b), (d) and (e)) to take account of a transfer of 150 tonnes from Lithuania and a transfer of 100 tonnes from Latvia obtained by the Community in the course of negotiations for 1995; - an increase in the TAC for Norway lobster in the North Sea (CIEM Divisions II(a) and IV) in accordance with the latest scientific information.