Traduction de «transmettre un titre meilleur » (Français → Anglais) :

108. Notes the level of error found by the ECA and the remarks on the difference of interpretation by the ECA and the Commission as to the amount that should not have been reimbursed (especially the difference of interpretation concerning rules relating to the eligibility of expenditure); stresses the need for further clarification and calls for the interpretation of the rules as to the application of financial corrections to be harmonised; also calls on the Member States which have not done so yet to provide as soon as possible annual national declarations on expenditure under shared management;

183. Notes that, in its 2005 Annual Report, the IAS issued a reservation concerning the fact that it has too few staff to be able to satisfy the requirement laid down in the Financial Regulation to the effect that the agencies should be audited annually; calls on the Internal Auditor to explain to the budgetary authority as soon as possible what additional staff are required for this;

Political dialogue, incentives and technical co-operation: ensuring that technical assistance provided to third countries focuses on IPR enforcement, especially in priority countries; exchanging ideas and information with other key providers of technical co-operation, like the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), the US or Japan, with the aim of avoiding duplication of efforts and sharing of best-practices. 4 IPR mechanisms in multilateral (including TRIPs), bi-regional and bilateral agreements: raising enforcement concerns in the framework of these agreements more systematically; consulting trading partners with the aim of ...[+++] launching an initiative in the WTO TRIPs Council, sounding the alert on the growing dimension of the problem, identifying the causes and proposing solutions and strengthening IPR enforcement clauses in bilateral agreements..

11. Welcomes the fact that, at the invitation of the EU Presidency, Members of the European Parliament participated in the 3rd round of the EU-Iran Human Rights Dialogue on 8/9 October 2003 and considers that Members of the European Parliament should be involved in the same way in future human rights dialogues with third countries; invites the Presidency to transmit its in-depth evaluation of the China dialogue as soon as possible and to prepare a similar evaluation of the Iran dialogue;

The Council requested the Presidency to forward this approach informally to the European Parliament with a view to reaching an agreement at the earliest possible opportunity on the draft Directive, which is subject to the co-decision procedure.

to send the Council as soon as possible its contributions on the next stages in the ongoing implementation of the ERA and its formal proposal for Decisions on the sixth framework programme during the first quarter of 2001, so that those Decisions may be taken well before the end of the fifth framework programme (2002), and preferably by the end of the first half of 2002;