Traduction de «vis de soutien » (Français → Anglais) :

clamping bolt | clamping screw

mental health community outreach worker | str worker | intensive support worker | mental health support worker

balance of payments facility | BOP facility | facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments

servicing costs | servicing expenses

Non-partisan Bloc for the Support of Reforms | Non-Party Bloc for Reform | Non-Party Bloc of Support for Reforms | BBWR [Abbr.]

higher education access officer | schools liaison and access officer | academic support officer | university access coordinator

EU aid [ aid from the EU | aid from the European Union | Community aid | Community support | European Union aid ]

apply support for spinal adjustment | apply supports for spinal adjustments | apply supports for spinal adjustment | use supports for spinal adjustments

screw-hole plug

worm drive | worm gear drive

Stresses the importance of stable and cost-effective renewable support schemes for long-term investment that remain responsive and adaptable in the short term and are tailored to national needs and circumstances, allowing gradual phasing-out of subsidies for mature renewable technologies; welcomes the fact that a number of renewable energy technologies are rapidly becoming cost-competitive with conventional forms of generation; stresses that the energy transition hinges upon the transparency, consistency and continuity of legal, financial and regulatory frameworks with a view to strengthening investor confidence; regrets retroactive c ...[+++]hanges to renewable support schemes that alter the return on investments already made; calls on the Member States to always announce any renewable support scheme adjustments and consult stakeholders widely well in advance; calls on the Commission to check the compatibility of national support schemes with the European Commission Guidance in order to avoid any unnecessary delay in their implementation and minimise market distortions.

Recognises the critical contribution of the African Peace Facility in developing the triangular partnership between the UN, the EU and the AU; believes that this Facility provides both an entry point and a potential lever for creating a stronger partnership between the EU and the AU and has proved indispensable in allowing the AU, and through it the eight Regional Economic Communities (RECs), to plan and manage their operations; considers it vital that the EU institutions and Member States remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully utilised and that the AU demonstrate higher levels of efficiency and transparency in using the funds; takes the view that the APF should focus on structural support rather than just bankrolling Afri ...[+++]can forces’ pay; acknowledges that there are other funding mechanisms in use, but believes that given the Facility’s sole focus on Africa, as well as its clear goals, it is especially important with regard to PSOs in Africa; considers that Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) working on peace-building in Africa should be given the opportunity to contribute their views, as part of a more strategic engagement with CSOs on peace and security; remains concerned at the continuing problems of financing and political will on the part of African countries; notes the Council conclusions of 24 September 2012 which state that ‘funding, alternative to the funding from the EDF, will have to be considered’.

9. Stresses the need to explore the possibility of a harmonised and more efficient procedure for submitting statements of support, as it is unacceptable that EU citizens should be excluded from supporting Citizens’ Initiatives owing to differing personal data submission requirements in the Member States; calls, therefore, on the Commission to propose simpler data submission requirements across all Member States in order to make it easier to sign an ECI, irrespective of the country of residence; suggests, in order to facilitate the signing process, that consideration be given to a mobile application, the redesigning of the Online Collection Software, and, in particular, the possibility of using digital signatures as a means of identificati ...[+++]on, bearing in mind also the needs of persons with disabilities; calls on the Member States, as a matter of urgency, to review the requirement of providing a personal identification number for a statement of support, with a view to the possible removal of this requirement, as such a requirement could represent an unnecessary bureaucratic burden for the collection of statements of support and also an unnecessary way of checking the identity of a signatory;

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 32014D0366 - EN - 2014/366/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 16 June 2014 setting up the list of cooperation programmes and indicating the global amount of total support from the European Regional Development Fund for each programme under the European territorial cooperation goal for the period 2014 to 2020 (notified under document number C(2014) 3776) // COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION - (2014/366/EU) // List of cross-border cooperation programmes with indication of the global amount of the total European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) support for each cross-border cooperat ...[+++]ion programme // List of transnational cooperation programmes with indication of the global amount of the total European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) support for each transnational cooperation programme // List of interregional cooperation programmes with indication of the global amount of the total ERDF support for each interregional cooperation programme // Contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to cross-border programmes under the IPA II for certain Member States