Traduction de «évaluer l’état d’une pêcherie » (Français → Anglais) :

4. Agrees with the Commission that the systematic collection of reliable data is the cornerstone of stock assessment and scientific advice; calls on the Commission, the Member States and the fishing industry to fill in the gaps that exist so that effort control measures can be adapted to each fishery, recognizing that most deep-water fisheries are mixed fisheries;

I'd just like to give a brief report on the condition of the sablefish fishery compared to May 11, when I was last here.

So that's the overview of the condition.

If, however, an annual report from a Member State makes references to any research conducted within the Member States to reduce the incidental capture of cetaceans in fisheries, the Commission shall communicate this information to the European Parliament and Council, followed within one month by an initial assessment of the research.

2. demersal species (a) Assessment by the Member States of the fishing effort necessary for each fishery, on the basis of the criteria given in Annex II and taking into account that: (i) effort levels shall allow each Member State, for each fishery, to take up fully its fishing possibilities, i.e. species subject to TACs allocated or not as well as species not subject to such limitations; (ii) effort levels shall be established pursuant to Community rules ; existing balances in exploitation by fishery and by zone shall not be disturbed; (iii) effort levels shall, in no way, affect the relative stability of the different fisheries (b) ...[+++]Where the potential fishing effort corresponding to free access for vessels on the reference list exceeds the assessed effort, the Member State concerned shall regulate that effort (c) Member States shall communicate to the Commission by 31.3.1995: - the reference lists; - the assessment of the fishing effort necessary; - where appropriate, the arrangements envisaged to regulate fishing effort.

Conclusions At the end of this first evaluation and analysis exercise concerning resources for the monitoring of the fishing industry, the Commission takes the view that it must in future give priority to the following: - validation of the information transmitted by each Member State on resources devoted to control work and the outcome of this work; - new areas being covered by control work at Community level (in particular structural policy, market monitoring, possibility of checks during transport, and the development of systematic cross-checks between different sources of information); - the problems in each fishery that lie behind major infringements of Community regulations to the possible detriment of other Member States (e.g. quota ...[+++] overruns in the North and Baltic Seas and disregard of technical conservation rules in Region 3); - coordination between national administrations and between them and the Commission departments, particularly through accelerated implementation of new technology (satellite monitoring, computer links, etc.), plus coordination of action at sea (e.g. in the Atlantic tuna fisheries, checks on catches by vessels operating in the EEZ of one Member State and landing at a port in another,etc.) To sum up, the report stresses the role to be played by the Commission in the process of coordination in order to improve synergy and dispel suspicion between the various interests involved.