Traduction de «PWGSC » (Anglais → Français) :

Public Works and Government Services Canada | PWGSC [Abbr.]

Doing business with A&ES [ Section 1 - General Documentation and Submission Standards | Section 2 - PWGSC CADD [computer-aided design and drafting] Requirements for Consultants | Section 3 - PWGSC Layering Manual | Section 4 - Specification Brief | Section 5 - Classes of Construction Cost ]

Designated Group Networks within PWGSC [ Designated Group Networks in PWGSC ]

Compensation Service Line PWGSC organization [ CSL PWGSC organization ]

...ernment Services Canada (PWGSC) may ask suppliers for evidence of compliance with local labour laws; (b) on how many occasions has PWGSC asked suppliers for evidence of compliance with local labour laws; (c) if PWGSC has ever requested evidence of supplier compliance with local labour laws, (i) which office within PWGSC initiated these requests and under whose authority, (ii) why were these requests initiated, (iii) when were these requests initiated, (iv) were these requests for evidence limited in scope to the production process under the direct purview of the supplier, or did they extend to all inputs in the production process ev ...[+++]en if these inputs were contracted out or otherwise not directly manufactured by the supplier, (v) what type of evidence did PWGSC ask suppliers to provide, (vi) did PWGSC request that suppliers provide evidence verified by independent auditors or inspectors, (vii) did PWGSC ever give individuals from the public, organizations, or governments an opportunity to provide evidence about supplier compliance with local labour laws and to whom were these opportunities extended; (d) if suppliers have ever responded to requests made by the PWGSC for evidence of compliance with local labour laws, (i) how did suppliers respond to these requests, (ii) what information did suppliers provide as evidence, (iii) where and at which office are records of these responses kept, (iv) what method was used by PWGSC to ensure that evidence provided by these suppliers was accurate, (v) did PWGSC ever rely on the services of independent auditors or inspectors to verify the evidence provided by suppliers; (e) what is PWGSC’s policy toward suppliers that are not operating in compliance with local labour laws; (f) has PWGSC ever determined that suppliers were not operating in compliance with local labour laws; (g) if PWGSC has ever determined that suppliers were not operating in compliance with local labour laws, what actions did it take; (h) has PWGSC ever rejected a bid from a potential supplier on the basis that this supplier was not likely to comply, or did not have a record of complying, with local labour laws; (i) has PWGSC ever withdrawn from a contract with a supplier, attempted to withdraw from a contract with a supplier, or threatened to ...

Also Present: Ezio DiMillo, Acting Director General, Major Crown Projects, PWGSC; Rocque Gameiro, Director, Sir John A. Macdonald and Security Program, PWGSC; Paul Frame, Project Manager, West Block Program and Program Oversight, Parliamentary Precinct Branch, PWGSC; Jeffrey Meek, Project Manager, West Block Program and Program Oversight, Parliamentary Precinct Branch, PWGSC; Sophie Bolduc, Senior Project Coordinator, Architecture and LTVP Program Management Directorate, House of Commons; Suzanne Verville, Secretariat

PWGSC decision-makers were informed that PWGSC personnel had engaged in discussions with DND, the technical authority, to understand the high-level mandatory capabilities and to determine if a competitive process could be conducted; considered the DND market analysis and met with another potential aircraft manufacturer to discuss their ability to meet the DND mandatory capabilities; and determined that the procurement strategy was in accordance with Treasury Board contracting policy and that this acquisition met the requirements of subsection 6(d) of the Government Contracts Regulations for a sole source acquisition.

Question No. 613 Mr. Matthew Kellway: With regard to the government response to Chapter 2 of the 2012 Spring Report of the Auditor General: (a) when did the departments of Public Works and Government Services (PWGSC), National Defence (DND), and Industry Canada provide their final responses to the Office of the Auditor General (OAG); (b) when did PWGSC and DND inform the OAG that they disagreed with the conclusions of Paragraphs 2.80 and 2.81 of the report; (c) was the disagreement with those two paragraphs approved by the Minister; (d) if this disagreement was not approved by the Minister, who were the officials who approved this res ...[+++]ponse; (e) what was the rationale for disagreement; and (f) how was this disagreement communicated to the OAG?