Traduction de «Shared cost call » (Anglais → Français) :

shared-cost program [ shared-cost programme | cost-shared program | cost-shared programme ]

shared-cost program | cost-shared program | shared-cost agreement

shared-cost action | shared-cost project | SCA [Abbr.]

shared cost service | shared cost number

shared-cost project [ cost-shared project ]

shared-cost contract

contributory insurance | participatory insurance | shared-cost insurance

shared-cost number

Difficulties arise because of prevailing uncertainty as regards the way in which "regulated markets" should fulfil their obligations to ensure that all securities comply with the requirements for "official listing" (as specified in Directive 79/279 [10] In essence, the practice to date has been that the regulated market should provide listing functions in respect of all securities which are dealt in on that market. This practice for "regulated markets" officially to list securities prior to trading can add significantly to costs and limit the scope for competing markets and exchanges to admit the same security to trading. admission to li ...[+++]sting and admission to trading must therefore be decoupled if more active competition between trading systems is to be facilitated. Furthermore, structural changes such as the demutualisation of exchanges call for a redefinition of how listing and public disclosure objectives are realised. However, before such far-reaching adjustments can be envisaged, an equitable basis must be found for sharing the regulatory overheads of listing and fulfilling related requirements such as dissemination of price-sensitive information. Without appropriate arrangements, profit-driven exchanges may seek to divest costly listing functions, particularly if they perceive competitors as "free-riding" on their listing services. This would jeopardise the important "public good" functions served by listing. Implementation of this approach should be foreshadowed in an updated definition of "regulated markets". It also calls for a re-examination of the provisions of Directive 79/279 [11].

Stresses in this respect the importance of identifying and sharing best practices in terms of national renewable energy policies and of promoting their adoption under a more convergent European model, favouring increased cooperation and coordination among Member States; calls on the Commission to maintain its role in monitoring the progress and actively supporting the development of renewable energies; highlights the importance of assessing renewables as to their competitiveness, sustainability, cost-effectivene ...[+++]ss and contribution to geopolitical stability and climate change goals.

80. Believes that the Parliament's building policy requires careful analysis and that the administration should continue to develop buildings policy in cooperation with the committee on Budgets; requests therefore to be kept informed on a regular basis on new developments for building projects with a significant financial implications for the budget, such as e.g. the KAD building; the House of European History and building/acquisition projects at the Parliament's places of work; asks to be kept informed about the creation of any new posts relating to DG INLO's three year plan before they are approved by the administration; asks the administration to establish a service agreement for ...[+++]cost sharing with the Commission of the running costs and any other institution that may wish to use the facilities of the House of European History; calls upon the European institutions to better coordinate their visitors' programs with a view to exploiting synergies, increasing visitor satisfaction and sharing cost; asks the Administration to improve the governance of interinstitutional projects;

84. Believes that Parliament's building policy requires careful analysis and that the administration should continue to develop buildings policy in cooperation with the Committee on Budgets; requests therefore to be kept informed on a regular basis on new developments for building projects with a significant financial implications for the budget, such as e.g. the Konrad Adenauer building, the House of European History and building/acquisition projects at Parliament's places of work; asks to be kept informed about the creation of any new posts relating to DG INLO's three-year plan before they are approved by the administration; asks the administration to establish a service agreement for ...[+++]cost sharing with the Commission of the running costs and any other institution that may wish to use the facilities of the House of European History; calls upon the EU institutions to better coordinate their visitors' programs with a view to exploiting synergies, increasing visitor satisfaction and sharing cost; asks the Administration to improve the governance of interinstitutional projects;