Traduction de «Value Life Committee » (Anglais → Français) :

life-time value | LTV | life time value | life-time consumer value

reserves [ reserve | policy reserves | life insurance reserve | policy value | life fund | mathematical reserve | actuarial reserves ]

Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the Cultural and Natural Heritage of Outstanding Universal Value | Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage | World Heritage Committee | WHC [Abbr.]

LIFE Committee

value of life [ value for life ]

radioactive half-life | half-life | physical half-life | half-period | half-value period | half-life radioactive

Definition: States of subjective distress and emotional disturbance, usually interfering with social functioning and performance, arising in the period of adaptation to a significant life change or a stressful life event. The stressor may have affected the integrity of an individual's social network (bereavement, separation experiences) or the wider system of social supports and values (migration, refugee status), or represented a major developmental transition or crisis (going to school, becoming a parent, failure to attain a cherish ...[+++]ed personal goal, retirement). Individual predisposition or vulnerability plays an important role in the risk of occurrence and the shaping of the manifestations of adjustment disorders, but it is nevertheless assumed that the condition would not have arisen without the stressor. The manifestations vary and include depressed mood, anxiety or worry (or mixture of these), a feeling of inability to cope, plan ahead, or continue in the present situation, as well as some degree of disability in 9the performance of daily routine. Conduct disorders may be an associated feature, particularly in adolescents. The predominant feature may be a brief or prolonged depressive reaction, or a disturbance of other emotions and conduct. | Culture shock Grief reaction Hospitalism in children

values and life style | VALS

7. Points out that the third year of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2014-2020 will be very important for the successful implementation of the new multiannual programmes (the third multiannual programme of EU action in the field of health for the period 2014-2020, the LIFE Programme for the Environment and Climate Change 2014-2020, the Union Civil Protection Mechanism 2014-2020) under the responsibility of this committee, as they will attain their maturity; against this background, highlights the fact that, given the persistent economic and budgetary constraints at national level, it is essential to provide and guarantee in th ...[+++]e EU budget the appropriations necessary to achieve the full potential and European added value of these new programmes;

In the medium to long term To create a regulatory environment conducive to sustainable growth: – pursue negotiations towards concluding a binding international agreement on climate change by 2015 to ensure adequate commitments by all, and notably from major economies, taking into account their respective responsibilities and capabilities while ensuring transparency and accountability as well as incorporating a robust system of compliance and enforcement, – call on the European Committee for Standardisation to finalise as speedily as possible standards for assessing the GHG emissions in energy-intensive sectors, – continue its efforts to de ...[+++]velop the Life Cycle Approach (LCA) methodology to allow better consideration of recyclability of materials, – assess the LCA evaluation along value chains and the recyclability of materials and integrate the recyclability of materials into relevant policy proposals and strategies.

The Committee would have appreciated more time to reflect upon all aspects of this bill and the views of those concerned, given the life-altering effects that security certificates have on those named in them, and the reflection the process has on Canadian society and values.

Question No. 207 Ms. Colleen Beaumier: With regard to the Department of Canadian Heritage’s Plans and Priorities for the Multiculturalism Program: (a) for the fiscal years 2005-2006 to 2009-2010, what is the actual and planned spending for all multiculturalism programs falling under the program activities “Promotion of Intercultural Understanding” and “Participation in Community and Civic Life”; (b) for the fiscal years 2005-2006 to 2009-2010, was any multiculturalism funding reallocated and will any multiculturalism funding be reallocated and, if so, (i) to which departments, (ii) how much funding has each department specifically received or will receive, (iii) to what purposes specifically; (c) for the fiscal years 2005-2006 to 2009-201 ...[+++]0, was any multiculturalism funding allocated or will any multiculturalism funding be allocated and to what purpose; (d) what was the total value of multiculturalism funding authorized and released by the Minister’s Office on the last two days of the 2006-2007 fiscal year; (e) in 2006-2007, what was the total value of multiculturalism funding allocated by the Department but not released to reimburse actual expenditures occurred by the organization; (f) who specifically is the “Multiculturalism Champion” and what is his or her mandate; (g) who specifically sits on the Departmental Steering Committee on Multiculturalism and what is its mandate; and (h) once multiculturalism is mainstreamed into the day to day operations of the Department, will the Multiculturalism Program exist as an independent program or department and will it or will it not receive funding directly as an independent program?