Traduction de «clear the screen » (Anglais → Français) :

clear view screen [ clearview screen ]

clear view screen | grating | hatch grating

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include sel ...[+++]f-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptoms, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

International Clearing House on Children and Violence on the Screen

clear aspect of the disc signal | clear position of the disc signal | off aspect of the disc signal | off position of the disc signal

clear the crossbar [ clear the bar | jump over the bar | bounce over the bar ]

renal cell carcinoma | renal carcinoma | Grawitz's tumour | hypernephroid carcinoma | adenocarcinoma of the kidney | alveolar carcinoma of the kidney | hypernephroma | tubular adenocarcinoma of the kidney | clear cell carcinoma of kidney | renal adenocarcinoma | clear cell tumor | renal cell carcinoma of kidney

in bond | under bond | uncustomed | duty unpaid | left unpaid | uncleared | not cleared by the customs | not cleared through the customs

Verify the information submitted by visa-exempt third country nationals (such as information related to identity, travel document, residence information, contact details etc.), via an online application ahead of their travel to the EU's external borders, to assess if they pose a risk for irregular migration, security or public health; Automatically process each application submitted via a website or a mobile application against other EU information systems (such as SIS, VIS, Europol's database, Interpol's database, the EES, Eurodac, ECRIS), a dedicated ETIAS watch list (established by Europol) and targeted, proportionate and clearly defined screening r ...[+++]ules to determine if there are factual indications or reasonable grounds to issue or refuse a travel authorisation; Issue travel authorisations.

Many Member States appear to be making use of the 'traffic light' approach to screening and have developed inclusion, exclusion and indicative or guidance thresholds based on the screening criteria set out in Annex III. Most Member States clearly welcome the introduction of Annex III as an aid to making more consistent screening decisions and have transposed it directly into their own EIA legislation.

In C-133/94 Commission v Belgium the ECJ ruled that Member States were at liberty to use either a case-by-case or a threshold approach to screening Annex II projects. The rulings in C-133/94 Commission v Belgium, C-72/95 the Dutch Dykes case and C-431/92 the Grosskrotzenburg cases also made clear that while Member States had the discretion to define thresholds for screening Annex II projects, these thresholds could not be fixed at such a level as to exclude whole project types from assessment.

The information reviewed for this report is not based upon the operation of screening in practice by competent authorities and therefore it is not clear how the various thresholds and other screening criteria developed by Member States are applied by competent authorities.