13. Considers that the Regulation should contain a new provision dealing with the opposability of choice-of-court agreements against third parties; takes the view that such provision could provide that a person who is not a party to the contract will be bound by an exclusive choice-of-court agreement concluded in accordance with the Regulation only if: (a) that agreement is contained in a written document or electronic record; (b) that person is given timely and adequate notice of the court where the action is to be brought; (c) in contracts for carriage of goods, the chos
en court is (i) the domicile of the carrier; (ii) the place of
...[+++] receipt agreed in the contract of carriage; (iii) the place of delivery agreed in the contract of carriage, or (iv) the port where the goods are initially loaded on a ship or the port where the goods are finally discharged from a ship; considers that it should further be provided that, in all other cases, the third party may bring an action before the court otherwise competent under the Regulation if it appears that holding that party to the chosen forum would be blatantly unfair; (c) dans les contrats de transport de marchandises, la juridiction choi
sie est celle i) du domicile du transporteur; ii) du lieu de réception convenu dans le contrat de transport; iii) du lieu de livraison convenu dans le contrat de transport ou iv) du port où les marchandises ont été initialement chargées sur le navire ou le port où les marchandises ont finalement été déchargées du navire; estime; par ailleurs, qu'il conviendrait d
e prévoir que, dans tous les autres cas, le tiers peut engager un recours devant la juridiction qui
...[+++]serait autrement compétente en vertu du règlement s'il apparaît que le maintien de la juridiction choisie exposerait la partie concernée à une injustice flagrante; 
