Traduction de «design proposal » (Anglais → Français) :

present detailed proposals for designs, present proposals for design detail | present in-depth suggestions for design proposals | present detailed design proposals | submit a detailed design proposal

proposal (EU) [ amended Commission proposal | Commission proposal | EC proposal | modified proposal | pending proposal ]

consider building constraints in architectural blueprints | consider building constraints in architectural proposals | consider building constraints in architectural designs | consider building constraints in architectural projects

zero-energy building plan | zero-energy building proposal | zero-energy building design | zero-energy building project

commitment proposal | proposal for commitment | proposed commitment

Environmental Protection Legislation Designed for the Future - A Renewed CEPA - A Proposal [ Environmental Protection Legislation Designed for the Future - A Renewed CEPA ]

marriage proposal [ proposal | proposal of marriage | proposal to marry | marriage offer | offer of marriage ]

designs and models [ design | industrial design | design(UNBIS) | design protection(UNBIS) ]

designation of origin [ certificate of designation of origin | PDO | PGI | protected designation of origin | protected geographical indication | registered designation of origin ]

To make future regulation fit with the ”Think Small First” principle, the Commission: is strengthening the assessment of the respect of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality in forthcoming legislative and administrative initiatives will, wherever practical, use common commencement dates for regulations and decisions affecting business and publish an annual statement of such legislation entering into force the Commission will, and the Member States are invited to: ensure that policy results are delivered while minimising costs and burdens for business, including by using a smart mix of tools such as mutual recognition and self- or co-regulation, to achieve policy outcomes rigorously assess the ...[+++]impact of forthcoming legislative and administrative initiatives on SMEs (“SME test”) and take relevant results into account when designing proposals consult stakeholders, including SME organisations for at least 8 weeks prior to making any legislative or administrative proposal that has an impact on businesses use specific measures for small and micro-enterprises, such as derogations, transition periods and exemptions, in particular from information or reporting requirements, and other tailor-made approaches, wherever appropriate, and the Member States are invited to: consider the usefulness of introducing common commencement dates and annual statements of legislation entering into force make use of flexibility provisions aimed at SMEs when implementing EU legislation and avoid “gold-plating” To improve the regulatory environment in view of the “Think Small First” principle, the Commission: will come forward with all the proposals to reduce the administrative burden on business which are necessary to achieve the EU reduction target of 25% by 2012 will complete by the end of 2008 a complete screening of the acquis and include the results in the updated simplification rolling programme to be presented in early 2009.

4. Contests are procedures which enable the contracting authority to acquire, mainly in the fields of architecture and civil engineering or data processing, a plan or design proposed by a selection board after being put out to competitive tender with or without the award of prizes.

151. Strongly recommends that the Council and the Commission, when designing proposals for the Structural Funds regulations, should provide for a more adequate regulatory framework so that the design and the implementation of financial engineering measures do not suffer from the deficiencies of the Structural Funds‘ regulatory framework, geographical constraints and scattering effects; asks that lessons learnt from the current programming period be reflected when designing the proposals for the Structural Funds regulation; considers ...[+++] in particular that proposals should be oriented towards performance and results rather than mere compliance;

151. Strongly recommends that the Council and the Commission, when designing proposals for the Structural Funds regulations, should provide for a more adequate regulatory framework so that the design and the implementation of financial engineering measures do not suffer from the deficiencies of the Structural Funds' regulatory framework, geographical constraints and scattering effects; asks that lessons learnt from the current programming period be reflected when designing the proposals for the Structural Funds regulation; considers ...[+++] in particular that proposals should be oriented towards performance and results rather than mere compliance;