Traduction de «narrative » (Anglais → Français) :

23. Believes that it is important to take a holistic approach in addressing and tackling the root causes of radicalisation in Europe; stresses that challenging the ideological narrative underpinning the actions of extremist groups and building a counter-narrative is one of the keys to combating the appeal of terrorist groups; expresses concern that relations between communities are being put under increasing strain across Europe and encourages inter-faith dialogue; welcomes the report’s references to the issue of training religious leaders in order to prevent hate preachers; calls on the Member States to criminalise terrorist acts th ...[+++]at occur outside of their jurisdiction, and agrees that this is one of the most effective tools for fighting terrorism and extremism; calls on imams and Muslim leaders to take the lead in the efforts against radicalisation and hate speech by countering fundamentalism and terrorism propaganda with a theologically based narrative; calls on the EU to support research and information projects on countering fundamentalism and on de-radicalisation by intensifying dialogue with Muslim communities with the aim of converging our efforts;

18. Is convinced that the internet is an effective platform for spreading the discourse of respect of human rights and opposition to violence; considers that the internet industry and service providers should cooperate with Member State authorities and civil society to promote powerful and attractive narratives to counter hate speech and radicalisation online, which should be based on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; calls on the digital platforms to cooperate with the Member States, civil society and organisations whose fields of expertise are terrorist deradicalisation or evaluation of hate speech, in order to ...[+++] take part in spreading prevention messages calling for the development of critical thinking and for a process of deradicalisation, as well as identifying innovative legal ways to counter praise of terrorism and hate speech, thereby making online radicalisation more difficult; calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage the development of such counter-narratives online, and to work closely with civil society organisations for the purposes of reinforcing the channels for distributing and promoting democratic and non-violent discourse;

16. Is convinced that the internet is an effective platform for spreading the discourse of respect of human rights and opposition to violence; considers that the internet industry and service providers should cooperate with Member State authorities and civil society to promote powerful and attractive narratives to counter hate speech and radicalisation online, which should be based on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; calls on the digital platforms to cooperate with the Member States, civil society and organisations whose fields of expertise are terrorist deradicalisation or evaluation of hate speech, in order to ...[+++] take part in spreading prevention messages calling for the development of critical thinking and for a process of deradicalisation, as well as identifying innovative legal ways to counter praise of terrorism and hate speech, thereby making online radicalisation more difficult; calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage the development of such counter-narratives online, and to work closely with civil society organisations for the purposes of reinforcing the channels for distributing and promoting democratic and non-violent discourse;

a summary risk indicator, supplemented by a narrative explanation of the indicator, its main limitations and a narrative explanation of the risks which are materially relevant to the PRIIP and which are not adequatedly captured by the synthetic risk indicator;

2. Member States shall give the information listed in paragraph 1 in the form of a narrative description, or a combination of a narrative description and a series of references or links to source documents.

35 of its 37 pages are almost purely narrative. They give an historical account of common positions, joint actions, declarations, demarches and dialogues for the period mid-1997 to early March 1998 but no assessment at all.