Traduction de «to consider with expediency » (Anglais → Français) :

to consider ... with expediency

consider to be appropriate [ consider necessary | consider desirable | consider advisable | consider appropriate | consider just | deem just and proper | think proper | consider expedient | think fit | think expedient | deem appropriate | deem just | deem advisable | see fit ]

consider building constraints in architectural blueprints | consider building constraints in architectural proposals | consider building constraints in architectural designs | consider building constraints in architectural projects

consider social impact of actions on a service user | consider the social impact of actions on the service users | act according to political, social and cultural contexts of social service users | consider social impact of actions on service users

advise and formulate plans for long-term care for animals | consider environmental factors in long-term-care for animals | consider environmental factors in long- term care for an animal | consider environmental factors in long-term care for animals

Committee to Determine the Expediency of the Islamic Order | Expediency Council

consider in more detail | consider thoroughly

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include sel ...[+++]f-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptoms, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

Regulation respecting fees of experts and investigators whose services the Commission de protection du territoire agricole du Québec considers expedient to retain

Set of Basic Principles Concerning the Conditions Upon Which Vessels Should be Accepted on National Shipping Registers, With a View to Preparing Documents for the Holding of a United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries to Consider the Adoption of an I

forwards, in so far as it considers it expedient, to the central offices of non-EU countries a set of specimens of actual euros.

The Council considers it expedient that all EU countries should become contracting parties to the Convention.

forwards, in so far as it considers it expedient, to the central offices of non-EU countries a set of specimens of actual euros.

25. Takes the view, therefore, that the ISS should further reflect the vision of the Stockholm Programme, and considers it expedient to undertake a mid-term parliamentary review of the Stockholm Programme before the end of 2013, in order to assess its strategic, legislative and financial priorities; also considers that a complementary assessment is needed with regard to the relevant European agencies currently being ‘Lisbonised’ (Europol, Eurojust and the European Judicial Network), along with other agencies and bodies; recalls that ...[+++] the actions and operations of the agencies must conform to their mandate as defined in the decisions concerning their implementation and operation, and must respect democratic values and principles and the liberties and fundamental rights laid down in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights;