Traduction de «information channel » (Anglais → Français) :

information channel [ information-bearer channel | information-bearing channel ]

operating channel | biopsy channel | biopsy forceps channel | forceps channel | instrument channel | instrumentation channel | suction/biopsy channel | forceps/suction channel | working channel

voltage-dependant ionic channel | voltage-operated ionic channel | voltage operated channel | VOC | potential-operated ionic channel | potential operated channel | POC | voltage-gated ionic channel | voltage-gated ion channel | voltage-gated channel

discharge channel | flood bypass | flood diversion channel | flood-bypass channel | floodway | relief channel | spillway channel

away-from-home channel | gastronomy channel | horeca (catering) channel | on-premises channel

channeling | channelling | transistor channeling | transistor channelling

official channels (1) | normal channels (2) | military channels (3) | proper channel (4) | channel (5)

Because the entity referred to in the response to Q-972 was involved in active projects in several countries, CIDA took the following specific measures to protect the interests of the Crown: CIDA established a multi-disciplinary task force to oversee a common, integrated and corporate approach to managing the situation and mitigating potential risks; discussions and meetings were held with senior representatives of the organization, who provided detailed information on the extent and severity of the financial situation, and the likely operational impacts; based on the initial information received, as well as a review of the current sta ...[+++]tus of project implementation, management arrangements and contractual terms and conditions, CIDA completed an internal review and assessment of the fiduciary and other risks across each program; a proactive monitoring and integrated risk management approach was developed and agreed with the organization, which featured open and direct channels of communication at a senior level to provide regular updates on the financial situation and recovery as well as to facilitate the dissemination of information on operational progress across the agency and decision-making on individual projects; in projects where the organization was part of a consortium, the agency agreed, on a non-objection basis, to the transfer or assignment of the lead implementation role to other well-established members or partners, who were jointly and severally liable; for projects where the organization was solely responsible for delivery or implementation, the agency took steps to ensure that all financial and performance guarantees were enforceable, in case of need; as part of its efforts to continue operations and remain a going concern, the organization presented a comprehensive business plan and financial projections that were developed with legal and financial third party advisors, a plan was subsequently validated by independent auditors as part of the due ...

Question No. 450 Ms. Judy Foote: With regard to Marine Atlantic’s executive hiring practices: (a) where has the position of Chief Information Officer historically been located; (b) where has the position of Operations for the ports of Channel-Port aux Basques, North Sydney and Argentia historically been located; (c) what is the rationale for the historical position locations; (d) why was the position of Chief Information Officer moved to St. John’s; (e) are there plans to move additional positions out of Channel-Port aux Basques; ...[+++] (f) what steps were taken to recruit a candidate who lived in or who would relocate to Channel-Port aux Basques when filling the Chief Information Officer position; (g) what were the job criteria required for the Chief Information Officer; (h) did the job posting specify that a successful applicant had to reside in or work in Channel-Port aux Basques; (i) how many applicants were there for the position of Chief Information Officer; and (j) how many applicants were there from Channel-Port aux Basques?

(Return tabled) Question No. 88 Hon. Carolyn Bennett: With respect to Internet applications: (a) is the government working towards the inclusion of rich Internet applications within its design and development with regard to its Web sites; (b) what is the government’s response to the American response to rich Internet applications made ten years ago; (c) is the government planning on adopting the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 standard; (d) what is the monetary impact of the government’s present use of WCAG 1.0 standard knowing that software contractors have built WCAG 2.0 accessibility into their software; (e) have software contractors requested that the government's Common Look and Feel (CLF) Committee relax or amend t ...[+++]heir CLF standards to allow for accessibility and, if so, can the government give details of the correspondence; (f) have software contractors required that the government pay extra because it must simplify their software in order to remove these accessibility features; (g) which federal department has the responsibility to ensure that all programs, services and technologies are accessible to people with disabilities and that they are available through the mainstream channels such as the Internet and in alternate formats; (h) is accessibility a mandatory requirement within information and communications procurements to ensure that blind Canadians have access to the same resources as all other Canadians and that they can access all of this through mainstream channels such as the Internet and in alternate formats; (i) how does the government of Canada inform blind Canadians about the availability of information to protect them from incidents of identity theft and fraud; (j) are the government's Web accessibility regulations up to date with today's Web technologies; (k) are Web developers in the government given the support they need to build accessible interactive Web sites, especially when building sites that offer essential ...

48. Takes note of the discussions currently being held within Parliament's Bureau concerning the possibility of creating a publicly owned parliamentary channel; welcomes the decision of the Parliament's Bureau to commission a feasibility study on the possible establishment of a parliamentary information channel or genuine European Parliament television channel; recognises that there are a range of different options for such a project and believes that any such channel should be independent; believes that such a channel could make a significant contribution to the development of a European public space; notes that, on earlier occasion ...[+++]s, it has requested the Commission to launch an in-house impact study on such a European channel; stresses the need for there to be greater synergy between the activities of Parliament's information offices and those of the Commission's representations;