Traduction de «Convention de garantie du découvert » (Français → Anglais) :

As a general rule, tying practices should not be allowed unless the financial service or product offered together with the credit agreement could not be offered separately as it is a fully integrated part of the credit, for example in the event of a secured overdraft.

BankCo [.] must give public notice that the UK retail deposit guarantee will be released by [.] and that the wholesale guarantee arrangements related to BankCo will be lifted by the United Kingdom by 31 December 2010;

a commitment that [.] BankCo will give public notice that the UK retail deposit guarantee will be released by [.] and that the wholesale guarantee arrangements related to BankCo will be lifted by the United Kingdom by 31 December 2010;

Once funds are released from the security created by the Royal Mail Holdings security agreement, the parties have acknowledged that the shareholder may decide that the GBP 850 million escrow funds (plus accrued interest) that are released from the security created by Royal Mail Holdings security agreement may be given to the shareholder using powers under the Postal Services Act 2000 or other applicable rights or powers.

The security agreements also set out the circumstances in which funds in the accounts may be released from the security created by the security arrangements, which broadly will be once the pension fund reaches a 75 % solvency level.

Possible main features of a Community regime are outlined, including: no retroactivity (application to future damage only); coverage of both environmental damage (site contamination and damage to biodiversity) and traditional damage (harm to health and property); a closed scope of application linked with EC environmental legislation: contaminated sites and traditional damage to be covered only if caused by an EC regulated hazardous or potentially hazardous activity; damage to biodiversity only if protected under the Natura 2000 network; strict liability for damage caused by inherently dangerous activities, fault-based liability for damage to biodiversity caused by a non-dangerous activity; [1] commonly accepted defences, some alleviati ...[+++]on of the plaintiffs' burden of proof and some equitable relief for defendants; liability focused on the operator in control of the activity which caused the damage; criteria for assessing and dealing with the different types of damage; an obligation to spend compensation paid by the polluter on environmental restoration; an approach to enhanced access to justice in environmental damage cases; co-ordination with international conventions; financial security for potential liabilities, working with the markets.