Traduction de «Destruction de données » (Français → Anglais) :

I would imagine that within the next five years, computer systems will have evolved to the point where we will be able to indicate, in reference to a particular case, that we do not want all of the data to be destroyed, but rather only one particular item.

Processing of personal data: According to Article 2(b) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, processing of personal data refers to "any operation or set of operations which is performed upon personal data, whether or not by automatic means, such as collection, recording, organisation, storage, adaptation or alteration, retrieval, consultation, use, disclosure by transmission, dissemination or otherwise making available, alignment or combination, blocking, erasure or destruction".

Processing of personal data: According to Article 2(b) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, processing of personal data refers to "any operation or set of operations which is performed upon personal data, whether or not by automatic means, such as collection, recording, organisation, storage, adaptation or alteration, retrieval, consultation, use, disclosure by transmission, dissemination or otherwise making available, alignment or combination, blocking, erasure or destruction".

So if there were a request to destroy data, as per some pre-existing protocol within a particular department, would the department in question, which is your client, be able to do that from their own system or would they actually have to provide you with a request to destroy data?

that after assessment of the requirements of the applicable data protection law, the security measures are appropriate to protect personal data against accidental or unlawful destruction or accidental loss, alteration, unauthorised disclosure or access, in particular where the processing involves the transmission of data over a network, and against all other unlawful forms of processing, and that these measures ensure a level of security appropriate to the risks presented by the processing and the nature of the data to be protected having regard to the state of the art and the cost of their implementation.

In addition, there was support during the consultations for the following: First, to add offences to the list of " designated offences" covered by the DNA data bank scheme including organized crime, " participation offences," uttering threats and criminal harassment; second, support to move " robbery" and " break and enter into a dwelling house" offences from the list of secondary designated offences to the list of primary designated offences so as to increase the likelihood that a court would make a DNA data bank order; third, to expand the retroactive scheme; fourth, to create a procedural mechanism to have a DNA data bank order that appears on its face to have been made for a non-designated offence reviewed and, where it is shown ...[+++]the court lacked authority to make the order, to authorize the destruction of the bodily substances taken under its authority; and fifth, to ensure that an offender's DNA profile remains in the DNA data bank until all orders against the offender have been quashed.