Traduction de «Décodage à décision dure » (Français → Anglais) :

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Dâmbovița — Interpretation of Articles 2(1) and 6 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9) — Notion of ‘working time’ — National legislation holding a forest ranger liable for any damage suffered in the section of forest under his control, despite the terms of his employment contract making him subject to a maximum daily working time of eight hours — Notion of ‘maximum weekly working time’ — Actual weekly working time exceeding the lawful maximum weekly working time — Effect of over ...[+++]time on the remuneration and financial compensation of the person concerned

The derogations granted by Decision 2002/499/EC were limited in time and the dates foreseen in that Decision have been prolonged by Commission Decisions 2005/775/EC (3) and 2007/432/EC (4).

4. If a contract of an indefinite duration was concluded by Europol before the date of application of this Decision and the staff member accepted a temporary agent or contract agent contract under the conditions laid down in the third subparagraph of paragraph 2, that contract shall be concluded for an indefinite period in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 8 and Article 85(1) of the Conditions of employment.

3. If a second fixed-term contract was concluded by Europol before the date of application of this Decision and the staff member accepted a temporary agent contract or contract agent contract under the conditions laid down in the third subparagraph of paragraph 2, any subsequent renewal may be concluded only for an indefinite period, in accordance with Article 39(4).

Assuming that the DOT is in a position to act favourably, based on the record and on the public interest considerations germane to its licensing decisions, the DOT would proceed to issue a single order (1) granting the exemption request for whatever duration would normally have been given, or until the permit authority becomes effective, whichever is shorter, and (2) tentatively deciding (i.e., show-cause) to award a corresponding permit, again for the standard duration that would normally have been given (such as indefinite for agreement regimes).

Assuming that the DOT is in a position to act favourably, based on the record and on the public interest considerations germane to its licensing decisions, the DOT would proceed to issue a single order (1) granting the exemption request for whatever duration would normally have been given, or until the permit authority becomes effective, whichever is shorter, and (2) tentatively deciding (i.e., show-cause) to award a corresponding permit, again for the standard duration that would normally have been given (such as indefinite for agreement regimes).