Traduction de «Parcours unique » (Français → Anglais) :

Commission publishes mid-term review of the 2015 Digital Single Market strategy // Brussels, 10 May 2017

14. Considers that EFSI should be funded as a priority from non-allocated resources within the EU budget and only as a last resort from the non-used funds of programmes under heading 1A of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2014-2020; emphasises that the financing of the guarantee fund should be reviewed in the framework of the 2016 mid-term review of the MFF and, on the basis of the analysis of the performance and execution rates of the different programmes, alternative funding options should be identified in order to minimise to the greatest possible extent redeployment of funds from heading 1A for the 2016-2020 period; stress ...[+++]es that the European Parliament and the Council should also explore ways to compensate to the largest possible extent for redeployments from EU programmes agreed in the framework of the annual budgetary procedure as a source of financing for EFSI in the years preceding the MFF mid-term review;

A. whereas in the context of the mid-term review of the Europe 2020 strategy, the Single Market and the Digital Single Market (DSM) should be considered two key tools for reigniting economic growth and creating quality employment in the EU, at the same time as ensuring complementarity with the more traditional drivers of growth, such as boosting investment in RDI, training and education, while paying particular attention to the needs of SMEs;

A. whereas in the context of the mid-term review of the Europe 2020 strategy, the Single Market and the Digital Single Market (DSM) should be considered two key tools for reigniting economic growth and creating quality employment in the EU, at the same time as ensuring complementarity with the more traditional drivers of growth, such as boosting investment in RDI, training and education, while paying particular attention to the needs of SMEs;

The mid-term review of the action plan offers a unique opportunity to step up efforts in a number of areas that merit more attention, including:

More efficient implementation of the mid-term review – In order to prevent delays in the mid‑term review, the Commission will draw up simpler guidelines for the competent authorities so that they do not need to conduct fresh negotiations if adjustments are made to the assistance given. With that in mind, the Commission will also extend the scope of the flexibility clause, which currently involves only changes to assistance, so that the formal approval of changes under the Community support framework or the Single Programming Document may be speeded up.