Traduction de «armoire de sauvegarde de données » (Français → Anglais) :

to recognise that digital innovation is a driver of economic growth and productivity in the entire economy; to recognise that data flows are a crucial driver of the services economy, an essential element of the global value chain of traditional manufacturing companies and critical for the development of the Digital Single Market; to seek, therefore, a comprehensive prohibition of forced data localisation requirements and to ensure that TiSA contains future-proof rules and prevents fragmentation of the digital world; to consider that forced localisation requirements, i.e. forcing service suppliers to use local infrastructure or establish a local presence as a condition of supplying services, deter foreign direct investment from and to a p ...[+++]arty; to strive, therefore, to curb such practices to the extent possible within and outside Europe, while accommodating necessary exemptions based on legitimate public purposes such as consumer protection and the protection of fundamental rights;

Such data should not be processed, unless processing is specifically necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest, on the basis of Union or national law which provides for suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's fundamental rights and legitimate interests; or processing is necessary to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another person; or the processing relates to data which are manifestly made public by the data subject.

Such data should not be processed, unless processing is specifically authorised by a law which provides for suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's legitimate interests; or processing is necessary to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another person; or the processing relates to data which are manifestly made public by the data subject.

MINDFUL of the EU’s commitments pursuant to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union on respect for fundamental rights, the right to privacy with regard to the processing of personal data as stipulated in Article 16 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the principles of proportionality and necessity concerning the right to private and family life, the respect for privacy, and the protection of personal data under Article 8 of the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Council of Europe Convention No 108 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Pe ...[+++]rsonal Data and its additional Protocol 181, and Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

A. whereas the data protection principles to be respected by the EU institutions and Member States are outlined in Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), Articles 7 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter of Fundamental Rights), Article 286 of the EC Treaty, Article 5 of Council of Europe Convention 108 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (Convention 108) and, at secondary level, Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of p ...[+++]ersonal data and on the free movement of such data and the draft Council Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters),

Among the amendments that have been tabled, I should like to highlight the following amendments for their importance to the economy as distinct from what I feel should be subject to a formal framework decision: greater harmonisation of the conditions of access to biometric databases, ensuring that such access is limited to investigations, and, in the case of fingerprint data, to the prevention of serious criminal offences; clear definition of rules applying to joint operations; establishment of strict necessity criteria so that the transmission of personal data is legitimate, especially when it comes to the most delicate situations, major events and preventing terrorist attacks; extending the scope of the chapter on data protection to al ...[+++]l forms of processing data, ensuring compliance with all recommendations put forward by the European data protection supervisor; implementation of a maximum period for keeping personal data; establishment of specific safeguards prohibiting the processing of sensitive data that may be used for the purpose of ethnic profiling; strengthening Parliament’s role in following up the proposal for a decision, in particular when implementation and assessment measures are adopted; and lastly, clarification of the relationship between this proposal for a decision and the proposal for a framework decision on data protection under the third pillar, the latter always being a general regulatory framework in the matter, in any situation.