Traduction de «commis-soutien aux enquêtes et contrôle » (Français → Anglais) :

Automation of Investigation and Control clerical functions

Crime Analysis and Investigative Support

46. Is greatly concerned by the crisis which has gripped the Central African Republic (CAR) since 2003; reiterates its condolences to the families of the victims of the clashes; reiterates its support for the independence, unity and territorial integrity of the CAR; reiterates its support for the ceasefire which resulted from the Brazzaville Agreement, initiation of the ‘disarmament, demobilisation, reconciliation’ (DDR) process, the coming pluralist, transparent legislative and presidential elections, and specific action to protect human rights; recalls the importance of peoples’ right to self-determination without outside interference; calls for the swift withdrawal of French troops from the CAR and the closure of permanent foreign m ...[+++]ilitary bases in the country; calls for stronger checks on UN forces and an in-depth, impartial and transparent enquiry into allegations of abuse or crimes committed; is particularly concerned at the vague notions of transnational companies in the CAR, especially those engaged in the extraction of precious stones and the harvesting of timber; recalls the inalienable right of peoples to their natural resources and the obligation of companies to submit to international law; underlines the importance for the EU and its Member States to commit fully – particularly in the Human Rights Council (HRC) – to the establishment by the UN of a binding instrument to be used against companies which fail to respect human rights;

Is a national law compatible with the obligation of a Member State to provide for the effective prosecution of criminal offences by customs officials if that law provides for criminal proceedings brought against customs officials — for participation in a conspiracy to commit corruption offences while performing their professional duties (accepting bribes for non-performance of customs inspections), and for specific bribery offences and concealment of bribes received — to be terminated, without the court having examined the charges brought, under the following conditions: (a) two years have elapsed since the accused was charged; (b) the accused has lodged a request for the pre-trial investigation to be concluded; (c) the court has given th ...[+++]e prosecutor a period of three months to conclude the pre-trial investigation; (d) during that period, the prosecutor has committed ‘infringements of essential procedural requirements’ (failure properly to notify a supplementary charge, failure to disclose the investigation file, contradictory indictment); (e) the court has given the prosecutor a further period of one month to remedy those ‘infringements of essential procedural requirements’; ([f]) the prosecutor has failed to remedy the ‘infringements of essential procedural requirements’ within that time-limit — albeit that the infringements committed within the first three-month period and the failure to remedy them within the subsequent one-month period are attributable both to the prosecutor (failure to remove contradictions in the indictment; failure to take real action for most of those periods) and also to the defence (breach of the duty to cooperate with respect to notification of the charge and inspection of the investigation file due to the hospitalisation of the accused and claims regarding the lawyers’ other professional commitments); ([g]) the accused has acquired a subjective right to the termination of the criminal proceedings on account of the failure to reme ...

Seventh plea in law, raised in support of the declaration of illegality, alleging that if Article 1(1) the Decision and Article 3(1) of the Regulation are to be interpreted so as to capture (a) any investigation by a Ukrainian authority irrespective of whether there is any judicial decision or proceedings underpinning, controlling or overseeing it; and/or (b) any ‘abuse of office as a public-office holder in order to procure an unjustified advantage’ irrespective of whether there is an allegation of misappropriation of State funds, the designation criterion would, given the arbitrary width and scope that would result from such a broad i ...[+++]nterpretation, lack a proper legal base; and/or be disproportionate to the objectives of the Decision and Regulation.

7. Reiterates its call for independent and impartial investigation of all cases of human rights violations, kidnapping, torture, ill-treatment and disappearances in the context of the protests; urges the Ukrainian authorities to support an international commission of enquiry, to ensure fair trial in a court of law, to fully cooperate with the Council of Europe International Advisory Panel, and to involve human rights and civil society organisations in the process; takes the view, furthermore, that the new Ukrainian authorities could request the assistance of the ICC for the investigation and prosecution of crimes committed by high-rank ...[+++]ing officials; believes that the investigation and prosecution of those responsible should be conducted in a way that allows all Ukrainian citizens to regain trust in the impartiality, independence and transparency of the justice system; calls for the EU and its Member States to remain closely engaged and offer their support and expertise to assist the process;