Traduction de «direct du droit » (Français → Anglais) :

12. The objectives of the bridge institution shall not imply any duty or responsibility to shareholders or creditors of the institution under resolution, and the management body or senior management shall have no liability to such shareholders or creditors for acts and omissions in the discharge of their duties unless the act or omission implies gross negligence or serious misconduct in accordance with national law which directly affects rights of such shareholders or creditors.

declare that, by prohibiting the registration of passenger cars whose steering wheel is mounted on the right-hand side and/or requiring prior to registration that a steering wheel mounted on the right-hand side of a new passenger car or of a passenger car previously registered in another Member State be transferred to the left-hand side, the Republic of Lithuania has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 70/311/EEC (1) of 8 June 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the steering equipment for motor vehicles and their trailers, Directive 2007/46/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of t ...[+++]he Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, and Article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

Without prejudice to Article 32, Member States not referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 2(2) of Directive 92/79/EEC may, as regards cigarettes which may be brought into their territory without further payment of excise duties, apply from 1 January 2014 a quantitative limit of not less than 300 items with respect to cigarettes brought in from a Member State which applies, in accordance with the third subparagraph of Article 2(2) of that Directive, lower excise duties than those resulting from the provisions of the first subparagraph of Article 2(2) thereof.

For example, we support the assertions that the Gus-Wen-Tah, or Two Row Wampum, is an ancient treaty right of all Iroquois communities and that Bill C-30 is in direct breach of this; that the Assembly of First Nations has no authority to represent our nations or our communities; that the federal duty to consult has not been met; that the tribunal, as proposed, is not independent; that land should be a part of the specific claims settlements; and that imposing Bill C-30 is a direct breach of and a purported extinguishment of our existing section 35 rights.

The Commission indicated, in its 2002 Communication on better monitoring of the application of European Community law (6), how it can and does assist Member States with transposition of Directives into national law.

Appearing before us today are Norman Moyer, Assistant Deputy Minister, Canadian Identity, Chair of the Continuing Committee of Officials on Human Rights; Adèle Dion, Director, Human Rights, Humanitarian Affairs and International Women's Equality Division of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade; John Holmes, Director, United Nations, Criminal and Treaty Law Division of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade; and from the Department of Justice, Ms Irit Weiser, Director, Human Rights Law Section ...[+++].