Traduction de «dispositif de poursuite récursive » (Français → Anglais) :

(80)The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Unionin order to: specifythe definitions of "critical functions" and "core business lines", specify the circumstances when an institution is failing or likely to fail specify the circumstances when the asset separation tool should be applied specify the liabilities excluded from the scope of application of the bail-in tool, specify the circumstances when exclusion from the bail-in tool is necessary to ensure the continuation of critical operations and core business lines, specify the criteria for the determination of the minimum amount of eligible liabilities required from institutions for the purpos ...[+++]es of the bail in tool, specify the circumstances when, in application of the bail-in tool, existing shares should be cancelled and liabilities should be converted into shares, specify the circumstances when third country resolution proceedings should not be recognised, further specify the conditions under which it should be considered that the target level of the financing arrangements has significantly deviated from the initial level, adopt criteria aimed at adjusting the contributions to the financing arrangements to the risk profile of institutions, define obligations aimed at ensuring the effective payment of the contributions to the financing arrangements and specify the conditions for the mutual borrowing between national financing arrangements.

25. Invites the Commission to present a list of those directives which have the worst record in terms of their implementation and to explain what it considers the underlying reasons for this to be; points out that, under the case-law of the Court of Justice and Article 10 of the EC Treaty, the Member States are required to ensure that an adequate system is in place for effective and proportionate sanctions, to act as a deterrent against infringement of Community provisions; considers that failure to adopt an effective system of sanctions should be pursued with due severity under the infringement procedure;

25. Invites the Commission to present a list of those directives which have the worst record in terms of their implementation and to explain what it considers the underlying reasons for this to be; points out that, under the case-law of the Court of Justice and Article 10 of the EC Treaty, the Member States are required to ensure that an adequate system is in place for effective and proportionate sanctions, to act as a deterrent against infringement of Community provisions; considers that failure to adopt an effective system of sanctions should be pursued with due severity under the infringement procedure;

24. Invites the Commission to present a list of those directives which have the worst record in terms of their implementation and to explain what it considers the underlying reasons for this to be; points out that, under the case law of the Court of Justice and Article 10 of the EC Treaty, the Member States are required to ensure that an adequate system is in place for effective and proportionate sanctions, to act as a deterrent against infringement of Community provisions; considers that failure to adopt an effective system of sanctions should be pursued with due severity under the infringement procedure;

Extending the responsibilities of the organisations to which the "terrorists" belong may create a handy mechanism for prosecuting troublesome organisations and parties but it also gives them the incentive to engage in provocation.

This trend is continued by the current proposal for the rapid reaction facility.